So his 17 class was trash your crazy if you think that and that lets me know how biased you are right there. He failed at Georgia because they think they are a championship program and he didn’t deliver one of those meanwhile his replacement hasn’t either so. My post is up for discussion you haven’t said a thing about who you would choose out of the 4 but claiming my takes asinine. When none of them are some great choice but out of the four with that staff and his experience that I picked out without a doubt he’s the most capable of stringing together winning football from past history. The jury’s only still out on manny the rest can’t get a hc job anywhere richt could still get a job as a hc today. He quit because he put himself in a bad position with nepotism and couldn’t fire his son, but wouldn’t hold his alma mater over the coals. He walked away without a fuss so we can try to build on what he left behind. Imo which is a great foundation for a acc championship team with proper coaching. I respect that you have your own opinion and I have mine but I’ll trust my eyes and knowledge of football any day before I listen to someone who clearly can’t even acknowledge the mans accomplishment but only find solitude in bringing up his failures. Also I’m not a richt fan or apologist I’m a realist he was a very good coach and solid program builder but he couldn’t get over the hump and was a bad playcaller at Miami
He failed. He was supposed to be an offensive mind, innovative coordinator, and he ran the worst offense we’ve ever seen. He was supposed to be this legendary qb whisperer, and he spent his last two seasons working with golden’s plan b back-up, because he couldn’t recruit anyone better or get them ready, and the guy he worked with was awful and definitely did not progress.
Richt was stubborn and refused to make changes. He was a lazy recruiter who refused to even fill the roster. He didnt care about winning. It was about him and his ego. His way. His son. Heck, he left his son in a job he was clearly unqualified for, at the expense of the team. That right there is awful.
As for his ‘17 class, you have low standards if you’re praising it. It was okay. We have two real UM quality players, a few others who may get there, and a few more contributors. Not awful, but certainly not what it takes to get back to where we want to be. Here’s what it gave us:
- standouts: garvin (kul found him, not richt); bandy (rumph)
- solid contributors with upside: dallas, donaldson, thomas, gaynor, ford
- we’ll see: steed, perry, burns
- depth: Harley, dean, herbert, d. Smith, jennings, carter, njoku, hillery, polendey, wilder
- paging al golden: weldon, feagles, DJJ, dykstra