What say you guys?
1. Gunter
2. Howard
3. Crawford
4. Burns
5. Dortch
6. Hope
I put burns at 4 because I think he will be an immediate impact guy at a thin position.
1. Gunter
2. Howard
3. Crawford
4. Hope
5. Dortch (still needs to add size)
6. Burns (CBs have trouble coming in quickly to make an impact in this scheme since it makes you think).
What say you guys?
1. Gunter
2. Howard
3. Crawford
4. Burns
5. Dortch
6. Hope
I put burns at 4 because I think he will be an immediate impact guy at a thin position.
not sure how anyone can legitimately rank these guys beyond Gunter and Howard, given the lack of playing time for the rest.
what are these rankings based on? Production at practice? high school performance? recruiting rankings?
What say you guys?
1. Gunter
2. Howard
3. Crawford
4. Burns
5. Dortch
6. Hope
I put burns at 4 because I think he will be an immediate impact guy at a thin position.
To be fair... I really wasn't impressed with Gunter... He maid a few plays against FSU but he was also suspect within that game and a lot during the season... I'm interested in seeing how Howard plays this year.... He was adjusting to the speed of the game last year, so I'm sure he'll improve much like B.Harris did, I hope his speed improved as well... We don't need a 4.2, just be adequate... But I also agree with one of the posters sentiments towards ranking these kids... We really only seen 2 play extensively, everyone else is a toss up...