Buster Douglas came back to win that fight.
Buster Douglas came back to win that fight.
I know I watched it when it happened, after Douglas was knocked the **** out with the punch in the gif, and it took the ref 22 seconds to count to 8 before the bell rang ending the round.
Jose Ribalta never fought Mike Tyson.
Jose Ribalta never fought Mike Tyson.
Yeah, you're probably right.
[video=youtube;fbNUekYhF1A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbNUekYhF1A[/video]
Huh? It was a great win for Miami to be sure, but how does winning by one point on your homefield somehow trump Auburn's resume of nine bowl victories, including the Sugar? Auburn's loss to Texas was infinitely more respectable than Miami's 28-3 loss to Florida before the Gators were a national power. Auburn's bowl win came on a neutral site. Miami's bowl win could've been a tie if not for a courageous decision by Nebraska coach Tom Osborne, who could've secured the #1 ranking with an extra point, but believed champions play to win. Finally, we have to consider that Nebraska was overrated to begin with--they'd also struggled to put away a 7-4 Oklahoma team in the season finale. The Cornhuskers were outstanding to be sure, but while they're running game was historically great, the defense and special teams were not. This re-evaluation of 1983 Nebraska also requires re-evaluation of the team that beat them. And I am convinced that Auburn was robbed in 1983 in one of the most short-sighted votes of the modern era. Caught up in the romance of a Cinderella taking down the heavyweight, votes lost sight of Auburn's incredible resume. The '83 Tigers deserve to take their place among college football's championship teams. Like the Cold Case show, let's see people like head coach Pat Dye and running back Bo Jackson come walking through the precinct office with some music in the background, while the file marked "1983 Auburn" is now listed as solved.
Jose Ribalta never fought Mike Tyson.
Yeah, you're probably right.
[video=youtube;fbNUekYhF1A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbNUekYhF1A[/video]
here's a response from the Auburn board
Huh? It was a great win for Miami to be sure, but how does winning by one point on your homefield somehow trump Auburn's resume of nine bowl victories, including the Sugar? Auburn's loss to Texas was infinitely more respectable than Miami's 28-3 loss to Florida before the Gators were a national power. Auburn's bowl win came on a neutral site. Miami's bowl win could've been a tie if not for a courageous decision by Nebraska coach Tom Osborne, who could've secured the #1 ranking with an extra point, but believed champions play to win. Finally, we have to consider that Nebraska was overrated to begin with--they'd also struggled to put away a 7-4 Oklahoma team in the season finale. The Cornhuskers were outstanding to be sure, but while they're running game was historically great, the defense and special teams were not. This re-evaluation of 1983 Nebraska also requires re-evaluation of the team that beat them. And I am convinced that Auburn was robbed in 1983 in one of the most short-sighted votes of the modern era. Caught up in the romance of a Cinderella taking down the heavyweight, votes lost sight of Auburn's incredible resume. The '83 Tigers deserve to take their place among college football's championship teams. Like the Cold Case show, let's see people like head coach Pat Dye and running back Bo Jackson come walking through the precinct office with some music in the background, while the file marked "1983 Auburn" is now listed as solved.
here's a response from the Auburn board
Huh? It was a great win for Miami to be sure, but how does winning by one point on your homefield somehow trump Auburn's resume of nine bowl victories, including the Sugar? Auburn's loss to Texas was infinitely more respectable than Miami's 28-3 loss to Florida before the Gators were a national power. Auburn's bowl win came on a neutral site. Miami's bowl win could've been a tie if not for a courageous decision by Nebraska coach Tom Osborne, who could've secured the #1 ranking with an extra point, but believed champions play to win. Finally, we have to consider that Nebraska was overrated to begin with--they'd also struggled to put away a 7-4 Oklahoma team in the season finale. The Cornhuskers were outstanding to be sure, but while they're running game was historically great, the defense and special teams were not. This re-evaluation of 1983 Nebraska also requires re-evaluation of the team that beat them. And I am convinced that Auburn was robbed in 1983 in one of the most short-sighted votes of the modern era. Caught up in the romance of a Cinderella taking down the heavyweight, votes lost sight of Auburn's incredible resume. The '83 Tigers deserve to take their place among college football's championship teams. Like the Cold Case show, let's see people like head coach Pat Dye and running back Bo Jackson come walking through the precinct office with some music in the background, while the file marked "1983 Auburn" is now listed as solved.
Jose Ribalta never fought Mike Tyson.
Yeah, you're probably right.
[video=youtube;fbNUekYhF1A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbNUekYhF1A[/video]
We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
Who gives a *****! Let the NYT send them a retroactive crystal trophy. t's the here and now I'm concerned about! I checked out all the DT's we got offers out to and the lowest ranked, Ryan Fines, is the only commit. The rest either committed elsewhere or it seems our chances are about as good Nevin Shapiro being inducted into the Canes Ring of Honor. We need DT's not waste concern about Circa 1983!