Ethnicsands
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 22,724
You misinterpreted my comment and missed the point.Actually, access to local talent does make your evaluation easier. Which is a good reason for any program (but especially us) to recruit locally. It's generally much easier to evaluate a kid that plays 10-20 miles away than it is to evaluate a kid 1000 miles away. A kid way across the country, you have to mostly go on tape and word of mouth and ratings. A kid in the area, you can see play on a regular basis.
That said, we're not going to stop recruiting nationally. It's not an one-or-the-other matter. We'll hit So Florida hard like we always do and we'll look around the country for needs we can't fill at home.
Evaluation of local talent, all else equal, should almost always be easier than evaluation to far away talent. But that isn’t the issue. The question is whether the amount of local talent makes (local) evals less important or more important - harder or easier in effect. This has been a long running back and forth around these sites. My point has been that the number of kids to consider locally requires resources and great evals to get right, but is also the reason we should focus locally and chase national kids only when they are easy takes (save a couple positions like QB and P/K where local recruiting isn’t usually sufficient).
Manny’s comments address this topic, which is why I quoted them. And I surely didn’t claim it’s an all or nothing issue. The important debate is about relative focus and resources.
Last edited: