OT: Minnesota boycotting bowl game

So if you don't do anything, the University gets destroyed like Baylor.

If you trying following the "process", your team boycotts.

I'm going with #2 . Sorry fellas, but you have to understand that as much as you think you are untouchable and running trains comes with the scholarships, it will bring unneeded scrutiny and trouble. Outside of ****, when is 10 guys ever seen as normal and not some kind of assault?
Lmao at a dude with PSU in his name talking about sexual norms and appropriate institutional responses.
 
Advertisement
So if you don't do anything, the University gets destroyed like Baylor.

If you trying following the "process", your team boycotts.

I'm going with #2 . Sorry fellas, but you have to understand that as much as you think you are untouchable and running trains comes with the scholarships, it will bring unneeded scrutiny and trouble. Outside of ****, when is 10 guys ever seen as normal and not some kind of assault?

When the woman is enjoying it, as the film indicates, it is in no way assault. She didn't show any signs of wanting it to stop... Is it normal? Well, what the heck is normal these days? You call anything "normal" and you're considered a bigot.

I should have been more clear in my previous statement and said "not assumed as assault" once a complaint is made. My apologies.

Also, I haven't seen the film (or know that was public) or read anything about it. I just know there is an active investigation, which should reveal all the details. I'm just saying things of that nature are not typically viewed as "normal" and will be heavily scrutinized. Knowing that, is it really smart to put yourself in that situation, especially if alcohol, drugs or anything else was involved? Regardless of outcome, it's a bad look.
 
So if you don't do anything, the University gets destroyed like Baylor.

If you trying following the "process", your team boycotts.

I'm going with #2 . Sorry fellas, but you have to understand that as much as you think you are untouchable and running trains comes with the scholarships, it will bring unneeded scrutiny and trouble. Outside of ****, when is 10 guys ever seen as normal and not some kind of assault?
Lmao at a dude with PSU in his name talking about sexual norms and appropriate institutional responses.

Wow, original dude. Did you come up with that all your own?

Graduate - doesn't meant i agree with everything that happened. Some of us do have minds of our own.
 
The usual bs trumped up, politically correct overreaction. Cheerleader goes partying with football players, let's football players run train, realises there will be proof that she really is the **** people say she is, and cries wolf.

The police say there's nothing to see here, so who the fvck does the university think it is to punish these young men?

http://kstp.com/news/university-of-minnesota-players-suspended-indefinitely-sexual-misconduct/4343997/


Let the facts come out...

But here is a rule for every dumb *** person (and those who want to hide behind technicalities) to live by. Running the train on a chick thats drunk in any capacity is basically clearing a room for yourself in the state pen. Its really a FN simple as that. Train + Drunk = JAIL!!!!

If multiple dudes had *** with her then they should be jailed. I don't give a F how you spin it. If they did not then it should be easy to prove and case closed.
 
The usual bs trumped up, politically correct overreaction. Cheerleader goes partying with football players, let's football players run train, realises there will be proof that she really is the **** people say she is, and cries wolf.

The police say there's nothing to see here, so who the fvck does the university think it is to punish these young men?

http://kstp.com/news/university-of-minnesota-players-suspended-indefinitely-sexual-misconduct/4343997/


Let the facts come out...

But here is a rule for every dumb *** person (and those who want to hide behind technicalities) to live by. Running the train on a chick thats drunk in any capacity is basically clearing a room for yourself in the state pen. Its really a FN simple as that. Train + Drunk = JAIL!!!!

If multiple dudes had *** with her then they should be jailed. I don't give a F how you spin it. If they did not then it should be easy to prove and case closed.

Ummm....maybe read what the police had to say about it before getting all high and mighty. Would keep that egg of your face.

Djam provided investigators with three recordings, one that shows the woman engaged in what could only be considered consensual sexual interaction ".

and

woman sounds as though she is somewhat intoxicated, but is not slurring her words and is certainly conscious and aware of what is going on. She does not appear to be upset by the sexual activity and does not indicate that she wants it to stop.

But the **** then says that she "believes" the *** was not consensual....but doesn't really remember. Gtfooh. If that is grounds for any kind of punishment, despite video evidence to the contrary, then this country is more fvcked up than I believed. Up to the Donald to sort that **** out.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
The usual bs trumped up, politically correct overreaction. Cheerleader goes partying with football players, let's football players run train, realises there will be proof that she really is the **** people say she is, and cries wolf.

The police say there's nothing to see here, so who the fvck does the university think it is to punish these young men?

http://kstp.com/news/university-of-minnesota-players-suspended-indefinitely-sexual-misconduct/4343997/


Let the facts come out...

But here is a rule for every dumb *** person (and those who want to hide behind technicalities) to live by. Running the train on a chick thats drunk in any capacity is basically clearing a room for yourself in the state pen. Its really a FN simple as that. Train + Drunk = JAIL!!!!

If multiple dudes had *** with her then they should be jailed. I don't give a F how you spin it. If they did not then it should be easy to prove and case closed.

Ummm....maybe read what the police had to say about it before getting all high and mighty. Would keep that egg of your face.

Djam provided investigators with three recordings, one that shows the woman engaged in what could only be considered consensual sexual interaction ".

and

woman sounds as though she is somewhat intoxicated, but is not slurring her words and is certainly conscious and aware of what is going on. She does not appear to be upset by the sexual activity and does not indicate that she wants it to stop.

But the **** then says that she "believes" the *** was not consensual....but doesn't really remember. Gtfooh. If that is grounds for any kind of punishment, despite video evidence to the contrary, then this country is more fvcked up than I believed. Up to the Donald to sort that **** out.

Anyone stupid enough to get involved with that kind of scenario, whether they're high profile or not, deserves what's coming to them I'm afraid.

I don't care if it was consensual or not, it's never going to end well.
 
The usual bs trumped up, politically correct overreaction. Cheerleader goes partying with football players, let's football players run train, realises there will be proof that she really is the **** people say she is, and cries wolf.

The police say there's nothing to see here, so who the fvck does the university think it is to punish these young men?

http://kstp.com/news/university-of-minnesota-players-suspended-indefinitely-sexual-misconduct/4343997/


Let the facts come out...

But here is a rule for every dumb *** person (and those who want to hide behind technicalities) to live by. Running the train on a chick thats drunk in any capacity is basically clearing a room for yourself in the state pen. Its really a FN simple as that. Train + Drunk = JAIL!!!!

If multiple dudes had *** with her then they should be jailed. I don't give a F how you spin it. If they did not then it should be easy to prove and case closed.

Ummm....maybe read what the police had to say about it before getting all high and mighty. Would keep that egg of your face.

Djam provided investigators with three recordings, one that shows the woman engaged in what could only be considered consensual sexual interaction ".

and

woman sounds as though she is somewhat intoxicated, but is not slurring her words and is certainly conscious and aware of what is going on. She does not appear to be upset by the sexual activity and does not indicate that she wants it to stop.

But the **** then says that she "believes" the *** was not consensual....but doesn't really remember. Gtfooh. If that is grounds for any kind of punishment, despite video evidence to the contrary, then this country is more fvcked up than I believed. Up to the Donald to sort that **** out.

Anyone stupid enough to get involved with that kind of scenario, whether they're high profile or not, deserves what's coming to them I'm afraid.

I don't care if it was consensual or not, it's never going to end well.

Why not?
 
Let me provide you with a few facts from Minn.sources.

1.The situation started in early Sept.when a number of Gopher players said to a recruit"Why don't you
look at the U of M and come to school here.To enhance that recruitment they decided to provide
a prositiute for his recruitment experience.Hence the consenual part of it.A number of players(4)
patiently waits their turn.However the woman said first 5 ok,last 5 not so ok.
2.Mpls. Police said"Yes *** took place but we don't have enough evidence to charge rape.
3.U of Minn.Adm steps in and says"Yes,but we have a different standard."What a CROCK of BS."
4.I met the Prez of the U of Minn. several times.Pompous ***! They want money from the alumni hence the meetings.
5.Prior AD fired for sexual harassment.Gee whiz,we don't want two in a row,Prez Kaler might get fired.
6.This situation has not ended,there will be a closed door meeting between BD.of Regents and players.
The players are asking also"Why has Wisc.kicked the crap out of us thirteen straight years,longest
streak in country other than U of F beating Kentucky thirty years in a row.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top