- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 15,337
This thread is funny; however, it also pinpoints something. For those who r deemed as mopes for voicing concerns over this offer/commit, their concerns have been validated, while those who are classified as slurpers have once again allowed emotions to cloud judgement. This thread also proves this narrative of “trust the evals” may, just may have some holes in it when it comes to certain positions. Lastly, it further validated spin narratives that have plagued **** near every recruiting thread this off season.
Riveting chit. I’ve taken the approach to no longer really engage on various threads b/c as I posted in this very thread on page 2 or 3, CIS is truly the home of ground hogs day.
The thing about locking in 3 stars early is you can be wrong on a couple evals and the senior season will expose the misses. All verballed kids should have a senior season plan and program, even the national elite ones. So if something goes horribly wrong like Sitkowski did and this one looks to be headed, no one is caught by surprise.
One reason I hated the Al Golden through to Manny Diaz late ads is they were lazy recruiters who missed on their Plan As and Bs, didn't keep up with the Plan Cs who ignored their last minute calls, so had to go out and find diamonds in the rough. For guys that were bad evaluators to begin with, they'd find 10 Dykstras or Tre Johnsons for every Zion Nelson they uncovered. The Mario approach is night and day with the "specials" we used to see.