- Joined
- Aug 5, 2014
- Messages
- 4,139
Record vs common opponent in Louisville I’m assumingWhat, exactly, is the tie-breaker over Clemson?
Record vs common opponent in Louisville I’m assumingWhat, exactly, is the tie-breaker over Clemson?
Right, everyone is assuming. No one really knows.Record vs common opponent in Louisville I’m assuming
Fixed itWe have to hope we can beat Cuse.
Because McCord will throw for 4000 on us.
Clemsons offense is not impressive.Clemson and SMU will hang 65 on Guidry
Not everyone. First tiebreaker is Head to Head record, out the window since we don't play them in the reg season. Second tiebreaker is record versus common opponents. They lost to Louisville, who we beat, and don't play GT. If we both finish with one loss, we have the tiebreaker.Right, everyone is assuming. No one really knows.
Yes, who do you think the ACC puts in between us and clemson? It's all about the ACC Championship now right?!Please re read
Career gameWe have to hope we can beat Cuse.
Because McCord will throw for 400 on us.
We have to hope we can beat Cuse.
Because McCord will throw for 400 on us in the first half.
Jesus...please read. We would be in over ClemsonYes, who do you think the ACC puts in between us and clemson? It's all about the ACC Championship now right?!
FactsClemson and SMU will hang 65 on Guidry
This is so stupid. Clemson has zero points at halftime.Clemson and SMU will hang 65 on Guidry
It’s not a assumptionRight, everyone is assuming. No one really knows.
I'd pitt beats clemson and Louisville and their only loss is to an undefeated acc smu squad, they should get in over us.If SMU, Pitt and us win out I’ve seen people say Pitt and SMU will get in because of conference opponent record. Can you imagine if we don’t make the ACC title game at 11-1 all because FSU sucked this year and Pitt didn’t have them weighing the opponent record down.
You're right.All these twitter posts just must assume Pitt will drop 1