Shooter McGavin
I Eat Pieces Of Sh*t Like You For Breakfast
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2015
- Messages
- 23,781
Haven't talked to him in a couple yearsWhat about Zach Kane?
Haven't talked to him in a couple yearsWhat about Zach Kane?
yes and he is 6-1 193 so he runs nearly as fast as CJjr and has ability to get to 215# as opposed to topping out at maybe 190-195 like CJY’all know that this kid had a 10.6 100 meter?
Yup. CJ can go to Ole Miss. Bring me this guy.yes and he is 6-1 193 so he runs nearly as fast as CJjr and has ability to get to 215# as opposed to topping out at maybe 190-195 like CJ
A lot of these HS highlight reels can be misleading. This kid has good straight-line speed and he has a frame that can add more mass. The issues I see are he runs stiff and stands upright when he runs. Even in traffic. You can get away with that in HS but he needs to learn to run behind his pads so he can finish his runs falling forward.
Also, on each play he's running through a hole 5-7 yards wide so you can't judge his vision or cutback ability. Plus the competition on that reel looks sorry as ****. Really poor effort trying to tackle him.
IDK man, I didn't see any elite traits.
His Junior tape was underwhelmingAs I mentioned on the Podcast and the Bank, this guy is emerging as a priority.
He is a little stiff in the hips but his speed is rare. His senior highlights are eye-popping.
Looking forward to his full senior HL. Everyone of his individual game clips has a long TD run where he blows by angles. Competition is weak but the speed is real.His Junior tape was underwhelming
Looking forward to his full senior HL. Everyone of his individual game clips has a long TD run where he blows by angles. Competition is weak but the speed is real.
Concerns would be elusiveness, ability to generate explosive power through the hips and generally football movement v. track. But if he gets a lane it is 6 points.
How is this guy different from Lingard seems like the same concerns but I would imagine Lingard prob had better track times. Can't look it up right now.Looking forward to his full senior HL. Everyone of his individual game clips has a long TD run where he blows by angles. Competition is weak but the speed is real.
Concerns would be elusiveness, ability to generate explosive power through the hips and generally football movement v. track. But if he gets a lane it is 6 points.
Very good comp. Miller played better competiton.Lamar Miller comp?
He seems to have a thicker build but it’s hard to tell without an in-person eval. Lingard had chicken legs.How is this guy different from Lingard seems like the same concerns but I would imagine Lingard prob had better track times. Can't look it up right now.
Sounds like LingardAs I mentioned on the Podcast and the Bank, this guy is emerging as a priority.
He is a little stiff in the hips but his speed is rare. His senior highlights are eye-popping.
As I mentioned on the Podcast and the Bank, this guy is emerging as a priority.
He is a little stiff in the hips but his speed is rare. His senior highlights are eye-popping.
Lingard was brain dead to football. Not sure what offense this guy plays in but Lingard played in a option attack and couldnt transfer it to a college offense. His issues are mental related.That’s a concern because so was Lingard.
But if you run the Veer and Shoot (please Baby Jesus!); then his skill set would fit in just fine.
Looking forward to his full senior HL. Everyone of his individual game clips has a long TD run where he blows by angles. Competition is weak but the speed is real.
Concerns would be elusiveness, ability to generate explosive power through the hips and generally football movement v. track. But if he gets a lane it is 6 points.
Lingard was brain dead to football. Not sure what offense this guy plays in but Lingard played in a option attack and couldnt transfer it to a college offense. His issues are mental related.