New NCAA rule

[TallyCane]

Will this effect us? http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/8572310/ncaa-approves-tougher-sanctions-rule-breakers

 

[bathtubgin]

We should have a ruling before Aug. 1 2013.

 

[Consigliere]

I would remain calm. Seriously, calm down.

 

[FRCane]

Infractions that occur as of Tuesday but are not resolved before Aug. 1. 2013, will be subject to the new sanctions. Schools currently under investigation, such as Miami, also could be hit with the new penalties if their cases are not resolved before Aug. 1, too.

"The committee on infractions could proceed under the new standards or could apply the penalties under the old standards, based on whatever is more beneficial to the institution," Strobel said.

 

[CUKIO34]

Absolutely, if they can prove mini madoffs claims.

 

[Shogungts]

Will this effect us? http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/8572310/ncaa-approves-tougher-sanctions-rule-breakers

Did you read the article:

Infractions that occur as of Tuesday but are not resolved before Aug. 1. 2013, will be subject to the new sanctions. Schools currently under investigation, such as Miami, also could be hit with the new penalties if their cases are not resolved before Aug. 1, too.

"The committee on infractions could proceed under the new standards or could apply the penalties under the old standards, based on whatever is more beneficial to the institution," Strobel said.

So yes, it could affect us, but what Bathtub said; we should have a ruling by then.

 

[Consigliere]

Infractions that occur as of Tuesday but are not resolved before Aug. 1. 2013, will be subject to the new sanctions. Schools currently under investigation, such as Miami, also could be hit with the new penalties if their cases are not resolved before Aug. 1, too.

"The committee on infractions could proceed under the new standards or could apply the penalties under the old standards, based on whatever is more beneficial to the institution," Strobel said.

Retroactive punishment, I highly doubt it. Plus I think we find out well before August.

 

[GhostofVenice01]

Infractions that occur as of Tuesday but are not resolved before Aug. 1. 2013, will be subject to the new sanctions. Schools currently under investigation, such as Miami, also could be hit with the new penalties if their cases are not resolved before Aug. 1, too.

"The committee on infractions could proceed under the new standards or could apply the penalties under the old standards, based on whatever is more beneficial to the institution," Strobel said.

Retroactive punishment, I highly doubt it. Plus I think we find out well before August.

This





/End thread

 

[tcgrad1014]

So basically the NCAA can do whatever they want. Nothing has changed.

 

[DapperSlapper]

The rule of lenity applies.

 

[Gapere]

we skate!

 

[Shogungts]

The rule of lenity applies.

But here we are again discussing this as if the NCAA has to adhere to court of law rules.

 

[DapperSlapper]

The rule of lenity applies.

But here we are again discussing this as if the NCAA has to adhere to court of law rules.

"The committee on infractions could proceed under the new standards or could apply the penalties under the old standards, based on whatever is more beneficial to the institution," Strobel said.

That's the rule of lenity. I didn't say it. The director of enforcement of the NCAA said it.

 

[Shogungts]

The rule of lenity applies.

But here we are again discussing this as if the NCAA has to adhere to court of law rules.

"The committee on infractions could proceed under the new standards or could apply the penalties under the old standards, based on whatever is more beneficial to the institution," Strobel said.

That's the rule of lenity. I didn't say it. The director of enforcement of the NCAA said it.

Ah, I missed that the first time around, however, I would be curious to know who is considered the 'institution' in this quote; the University or the NCAA.

 

[JHallCanes]

Translation:

We skate.

NCAA announces "but next time....." plan.

 

[DapperSlapper]

The rule of lenity applies.

But here we are again discussing this as if the NCAA has to adhere to court of law rules.

"The committee on infractions could proceed under the new standards or could apply the penalties under the old standards, based on whatever is more beneficial to the institution," Strobel said.

That's the rule of lenity. I didn't say it. The director of enforcement of the NCAA said it.

Ah, I missed that the first time around, however, I would be curious to know who is considered the 'institution' in this quote; the University or the NCAA.

Pursuant to NCAA bylaws, "institution" refers to the school. Schools are known as "member institutions" or just "institutions."

 

[Shogungts]

The rule of lenity applies.

But here we are again discussing this as if the NCAA has to adhere to court of law rules.

"The committee on infractions could proceed under the new standards or could apply the penalties under the old standards, based on whatever is more beneficial to the institution," Strobel said.

That's the rule of lenity. I didn't say it. The director of enforcement of the NCAA said it.

Ah, I missed that the first time around, however, I would be curious to know who is considered the 'institution' in this quote; the University or the NCAA.

Pursuant to NCAA bylaws, "institution" refers to the school. Schools are known as "member institutions" or just "institutions."

Well then, that is encouraging news.

 

[Port Knox]

Wonder if this applies to the SEC. pffffffffffffttt!!!!

 

[TreOFive]

Really appreciate how the writer went out of his way to single us out....the "love" we get amazes me

 

[canecountry3]

Really appreciate how the writer went out of his way to single us out....the "love" we get amazes me

As a fan, I love it.