The same fanbase that left Nike merch on the shelves for YEARS? Keep in mind, a lot of our “fans” still rock gear from almost 25 years ago. Let’s stop pretending that these fans are being held back from buying merch. Our fans are cheap, always has been, always will be.
This has got to be a joke. Or else you let Harry Rothwell use your log-in.
What kind of Beta-Blake-gobbling bull****ter says that Nike merchandise didn't sell "for YEARS"? That's a lie. The Nike merchandise sold every year, and sold EVEN BETTER when we had something exciting going on. In the LAST YEAR with Nike, when the writing was clearly on the wall, and Beta Blake was cashing out our uniforms for cash payments, Nike introduced the Smoke jersey, and it sold like crazy. You can barely even find that jersey on eBay or anywhere else, because nobody wants to get rid of it. And the rest of the Nike merch sold too. I guaran-*******-tee you one thing, AllCanes and CanesWear did not have lengthy clearance sales of Nike merch, that stuff sold because people wanted it, not because the price was reduced.
Now,
@Rellyrell and I have already given numerous accounts of how the UM-Nike relationship deteriorated under The Shermanator and Beta Blake. We did not have good decision-making by the AD's office and we were not playing winning football.
But there are other truths as well. The UM Bookstore in 2025 looks NOTHING like the UM Bookstore of 2015 when it comes to UM merchandise and the capacity to market and sell a wide range of merch. And the Rivals website(s) in 2025 look NOTHING like the websites of 2015. The entire merchandise game has changed, and the concept of "merch left on the shelves for years" is both false for 2015 and unthinkable for 2025. Just sheer stupidity.
Not to mention the ignorant falsehoods like our fans are "cheap" and "still rocking gear from 25 years ago". For one thing, the reason why people "rock gear from 25 years ago" is because THAT'S WHEN WE WERE WINNING CHAMPIONSHIPS. Not because of "cheapness". And I choose to buy Miami Nike gear on eBay BECAUSE IT IS BETTER QUALITY that adidas, not because I'm cheap. There are exceptions. The adidas polo I'm wearing today at work is high quality and durable. But sadly, the batch of adidas polos I bought in 2024 (the ones that had different colors around the collar and buttons) are flimsy ill-fitting crap.
Ultimately, while I have great respect for Harry Rothwell, his issues with "Nike vs. adidas customer service" should be nowhere near the top of the considerations for UM. I empathize with his situation, but the truth is that we should go with the apparel company that is the MOST dominant and popular and reliable over the years. Sure, maybe Harry encountered some customer service issues with Nike 10 years ago, I get it. But if that were some chronic Nike issue, why doesn't that happen at every school in 2025? Maybe it's an issue Nike addressed years ago? Or maybe the problem was UM?
It's time to stop telling 10 year old lies. It's time to stop carrying water for Beta Blake, he's long-gone and living in Boston.