mossmadness
"Couldn't" Care Less.
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 5,886
Your ability to bring in talent is a largely a direct result of your location. Look at the landscape of college football right now. There are like 2 exceptions to that. A couple of northern schools which lock down their state and are able to win out of state recruiting battles for elite talent. Everybody else, Cali and the South.
And what schools have long term success with 2 or 3 star players? Especially 2 or 3 star players that aren't located in huge talent areas? Yeah, you might be able to take a team like Baylor, give them maybe the greatest offensive mind in the last 40 years, and put them in an area where there is SO much talent, that you can't scout them all. Some are going to fall through the cracks. But even that isn't a long term solution. Baylor and TCU now bring in top 20 classes, as they have to for long term success. But the reason why they can bring in those recruiting classes is because they are in Texas. That isn't a luxury that Narduzzi has. Let him win 10 games a year this year. He's still going to be stuck trying to find the diamond in the roughs the big time schools miss out on, AND convincing all of them to choose Pitt over their local, mid-tier programs (Rutgers, Duke, BC, South Florida, NC State, etc.). Good luck with it.
And I brought up those schools because they have new coaches and so fit the idea of, "The ACC is comin'!!!!!" But I don't worry about those schools. A team like UNC, with it's campus and location, has far more upside than any of those schools do. UNC is the type of program that you could see locking down all the talent in NC, and then going to neighboring southern states and pulling 4 stars to supplement the 4 star NC talent. And that could be an issue for us going forward. I could see 2 or 3 years from now UNC and Miami deciding the Coastal every year. But UVA or Pitt being involved in that conversation? No.
And what schools have long term success with 2 or 3 star players? Especially 2 or 3 star players that aren't located in huge talent areas? Yeah, you might be able to take a team like Baylor, give them maybe the greatest offensive mind in the last 40 years, and put them in an area where there is SO much talent, that you can't scout them all. Some are going to fall through the cracks. But even that isn't a long term solution. Baylor and TCU now bring in top 20 classes, as they have to for long term success. But the reason why they can bring in those recruiting classes is because they are in Texas. That isn't a luxury that Narduzzi has. Let him win 10 games a year this year. He's still going to be stuck trying to find the diamond in the roughs the big time schools miss out on, AND convincing all of them to choose Pitt over their local, mid-tier programs (Rutgers, Duke, BC, South Florida, NC State, etc.). Good luck with it.
And I brought up those schools because they have new coaches and so fit the idea of, "The ACC is comin'!!!!!" But I don't worry about those schools. A team like UNC, with it's campus and location, has far more upside than any of those schools do. UNC is the type of program that you could see locking down all the talent in NC, and then going to neighboring southern states and pulling 4 stars to supplement the 4 star NC talent. And that could be an issue for us going forward. I could see 2 or 3 years from now UNC and Miami deciding the Coastal every year. But UVA or Pitt being involved in that conversation? No.