Where are you hearing this? I haven't heard any such thing. Also, isn't there a rule that a player cannot sign without achieving the necessary ACT/SAT score first? If his test is under review then im not sure he would've been qualified to sign on NSD
reading comprehension is poor. the suggestion arising from the alleged re-take of the ACT is not that he put in the work or that he's improved, but something fishy happened during the first because he got a score significantly higher than historical performance.
I was at the Clemson game.
My condolences.
June 27th we will find out.
I'm not going to confirm anything but when I was at the Clemson game, I was there with him & his family and they were confident he's getting in. Obviously take with grain of salt as you wish.
I was told through a source(my friends little brother is going to Gulliver this upcoming school year and on the football team, has 2 D-1 offers already), apparently he needed 10 more points on one of his tests. This was a while back though.
June 27th we will find out.
I'm not going to confirm anything but when I was at the Clemson game, I was there with him & his family and they were confident he's getting in. Obviously take with grain of salt as you wish.
I was told through a source(my friends little brother is going to Gulliver this upcoming school year and on the football team, has 2 D-1 offers already), apparently he needed 10 more points on one of his tests. This was a while back though.
Must be the SAT. Maybe he got a 790 and he needs an 800 to get in.
I was at the Clemson game.
My condolences.
So the NCAA supposedly flagged a test score for being too low? Makes perfect sense.Must be the SAT. Maybe he got a 790 and he needs an 800 to get in.