I know you take some heat on this board but I would love to sit down with you and find out what you are all about. I am a pretty level headed guy (unless I am behind a bench in a rink coaching) and chatting you up would be something I would find fascinating. I mean this in the best possible way. The antagonize button has been disabled my man.
Now back to the info so this does not derail things for the others.
If you've seen a gaping video, you've seen Jagr.
He only cares about his own opinion, there is no "sitting down with him and finding out what he is all about". You could propose 10 great ideas for discussion, and he will arrogantly tell you that you know nothing about [insert topic here] while acting as if he is the only person with any authority on the subject.
I've been going to UM baseball games since 1987. I tutored for the Athletic Department and as a result I knew most of the baseball players. I was in classes with Gino DiMare and other baseball players. But somehow, this Jagr guy will act as if people like myself "don't understand NCAA baseball" and that we can't possibly have any good ideas on how to improve it or move it into a modern era.
Some people are stuck in the past, or stuck in a particular same-old-same-old way of doing things. That's Jagr.
Never forget this. In my lifetime, college football, as a sport, as an institution, as an event, as a force, has EXPLODED. And it wasn't because football was some unique thing. NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma. 468 U.S. 85 (1984). If you don't know what that is, go look it up.
And since 1984, the TV exposure for college football has transformed the game.
Given the relative popularity (and attendance) for pro football vs. pro baseball, there is NO REASON that NCAA baseball should be so inferior to NCAA football. We need something similar to that Supreme Court case to transform NCAA baseball.
I'm sick and tired of going to UM baseball games with half of the residents of Del Boca Vista (Phase III).