Zbrod95
Thank God for the Columbus Mafia
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2015
- Messages
- 27,036
This is what killed me on @Zbrod95 Tu Tu's take. He was the one that was EASIEST to spot as a hit in college at wr.....and his **** dad was an all conference type at WR. iT 100% WASNT A SHOT IN THE DARK...or some 7 on 7 marvel (though Tu Tu did do well at wr in 7 on7)
WE KNEW.
Tu Tu was similar to Duke Johnson in the city n there wasnt a cane fan that didnt think Duke wouldnt hit as a college player...same trajectory...from Youth ball to high school to college
Very true, it’s not but you’re talking about somebody that’s even smaller than Roscoe. Combine even provided it. He was 160 soaking wet. He wasn’t even a starter for Louisville. Did you make great plays? Yea but when it came to be an WR he was not that good and dropped passes hence why they used him in a gadget role. Roscoe could actually line up at WR. Tutu on the other hand had scripted plays that got him open. The argument isn’t that he wasn’t fast or had talent but more of how he was used. Do you really think a career gadget guy wins more games for UM? Because in this case he didn’t win any for Louisville that I could think of.having never played WR before college shouldn’t dissuade you from a prospect. Warrick, anquan, roscoe come to mind just off the top of my head of prep QBs who changed positions in college. A baller is a baller.