Mike Harley updated highlights

[ageezy]

All I see is a quick little dude. Not much else to say. He is not elite and his upside is probably limited. He is a mid-major prospect. If he was not on STA, we may not be having this conversation. He may squeeze into the class as a Sam Bruce type replacement.

but he is at STA, so that means he's performing against top notch competition just about every week . . . also, we're not asking him to be a #1 receiver . . . but a complimentary speed guy is nice to have . . . i personally want to see a receiving core that is a threat to house it every time they touch the rock ala richards . . . this guy fits the mold

 

[Cribby]

I don't get or understand the IMac comparisons. Harley is two inches taller and already the same weight as Isaiah , and Harley is 3-4 years younger.

Harley is also a really good route runner , and a perfect slot guy. Isaiah is pretty much a gimmick, return guy. He was never a polished route guy.

 

[GODsRebel]

I was on the fence earlier in year but definitely want now. I was able to watch him live last fri nite & had a nice TD grab against dwyer. He's a burner. At least would be nice to watch him return kicks instead of lead shoes #8 & 9

 

[The Franchise]

I don't get or understand the IMac comparisons. Harley is two inches taller and already the same weight as Isaiah , and Harley is 3-4 years younger.

Harley is also a really good route runner , and a perfect slot guy. Isaiah is pretty much a gimmick, return guy. He was never a polished route guy.

People are dopey. They see a smaller fast guy and they go with McKenzie.

Harley is nothing like McKenzie other than they're both fast and light.

 

[maurice3p]

Harley is a better WR than McKenzie.

Harley doesn't have moves like McKenzie, but he's quick and fast. Dorsett/Rashad Greene type.