Are they going to appeal. That wasn't Blake's statement. It was that he was going to inform the NCAA that UM had already self imposed an undisclosed number of scholarships and see if NCAA is willing to amend the number. Not sure that equals an appeal.
Why wouldn't this information already have been relayed to the ncaa beforehand?
Why wouldn't this information already have been relayed to the ncaa beforehand?
Why wouldn't this information already have been relayed to the ncaa beforehand?
What he said.
Why wouldn't this information already have been relayed to the ncaa beforehand?
Because until you know if there will be ANY scholarship reduction, (until punishment is determined) you sit tight and don't do anything.
Maybe there was the hope (as slim as might be) there will be no more punishment, only time served.
If you pay attention to the details of the ruling, you will see the devil quite clearly. Man, UM did a masterful job of making sure the language regarding the scholarship reductions maximized its ability to mitigate any real impact. Especially when coupled with the preemptive moves we made.
Why wouldn't this information already have been relayed to the ncaa beforehand?
Because until you know if there will be ANY scholarship reduction, (until punishment is determined) you sit tight and don't do anything.
Maybe there was the hope (as slim as might be) there will be no more punishment, only time served.
But if you've already self imposed limits, what would be the point of not telling them until after the fact? That doesn't make much sense. If you get time served, how does saying that you've already held back X number of scholarships hurt you? It doesn't. Meanwhile, if you keep the self imposed reductions to yourself, get hit with reductions from the NCAA, and then after the fact say, "but we've already held back X number of scholarships," the NCAA is going to call BS (and rightfully so).