- Joined
- Feb 14, 2012
- Messages
- 5,065
Heard we might lose Brashard Smith.
That would suck
It is tough because he’s WR 4 behind X, George, & Young
And I’m sure Ray Ray wants more touches too
Heard we might lose Brashard Smith.
And Robby Washington. And CJ jr. And the 3 or 4 new WRs coming in.That would suck
It is tough because he’s WR 4 behind X, George, & Young
And I’m sure Ray Ray wants more touches too
Heard we might lose Brashard Smith.
ray ray is a faster brashardSucks…. He was a a true spark for the offense… his Aggie return or that clemson long run..
He’s WR4 though still… gotta hope RayRay or Robby can take that role and run with it like he did
This what makes me lol when I read mario wants his “own guys”. He chose to use manny guys over his own in many instances.Brashard deserves to play more. Dawson/TVD misused him, and didn't use CJ, Robby, Ray Ray, Harrell or Skinner at all. Complete waste of talent.
This what makes me lol when I read mario wants his “own guys”. He chose to use manny guys over his own in many instances.
That would mean fewer sets with our tight end who doesn't catch passes. Can't be fizical without a 6th offensive lineman on the field.Brashard deserves to play more. Dawson/TVD misused him, and didn't use CJ, Robby, Ray Ray, Harrell or Skinner at all. Complete waste of talent.
That would mean fewer sets with our tight end who doesn't catch passes. Can't be fizical without a 6th offensive lineman on the field.
How to you propose using ALL of those guys? (while also using TE's?)Brashard deserves to play more. Dawson/TVD misused him, and didn't use CJ, Robby, Ray Ray, Harrell or Skinner at all. Complete waste of talent.
Honestly that's really the main issue. Guys like Brashard would see the field more if we utilized more 10 personnel.That would mean fewer sets with our tight end who doesn't catch passes. Can't be fizical without a 6th offensive lineman on the field.
Are other teams not involved in Champ Games going through this too? We lost about six contributors yesterday. Is an Ole Miss, Tenn, or UNC dealing with the same?
Not to mention the 3 starters.How to you propose using ALL of those guys? (while also using TE's?)
Do we care about a pointless bowl game or do we care about next season? TVD declaring the portal early erases any hint of a QB1 battle for anyone in the portal who might be interested in us. We can do the full court press on transfers as early as possible now.
Considering our tight end situation, we should have used a ton of 10 personnel. I know they want to run the ball but McCormick should not have been on the field for 90% of the offensive plays this year. I know Arroyo was hurt, Williams is a freshman and Skinner apparently fell off a cliff but forcing 11 and 12 personnel, especially when not in short yardage was counter-productive. Having such a one dimensional tight end really made us predictable.Honestly that's really the main issue. Guys like Brashard would see the field more if we utilized more 10 personnel.
But the fact of the matter is, most coaches aren't going to abandon a system that they believe in just to appease a couple players.
We're undoubtable more explosive with 3/4 WR's on the field but the staff feels that our TE's give us something in the run game. (IMO that's about all they give us)
Yea you can’t tell who either coached or played football beyond HS LOL.How to you propose using ALL of those guys? (while also using TE's?)
Couldn't trust him as a route runner. Only way to get him the ball was a hand off, screen, trick play, or a slot fade.Severely misused him. Electric with the rock.