Ghandi
Junior
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 6,249
Because he was employed and also remember they let the pedo coach the gymnastic team for years.
What does have to do with this issue?
Because he was employed and also remember they let the pedo coach the gymnastic team for years.
Perception.What does have to do with this issue?
Stupidest sh*t one can possibly fathom...
Why in the name of God would you put yourself in this type of predicament??...
Ha,I doubt many here know who this is and what he did.I still can't believe he did it and how he's still doing interviews and shows like nothing happened.
In this class these are 2 guys i would offer and give a visit to.I hate to be that dude but is there anyone on their squad worth a look to bring in?
As I stated before… when they paying you that kind of bread, no side hoes. Even if you are a single man. Ask Ime Udoka.Don't know the details here but guys no wacking off on facetime calls. I don't care if she is showing you her hooters and talking dirty. Keep it in your pants. Pretty soon you will need a signed contract before every sexual encounter. Stay safe boyz..
That was one expensive jerk session…he could have at least of badsass chick doing it for him…
Sounds like they will be paying her.Brenda Tracy said leak came from MSU boardroom
Holy crap... If it turns out someone at Michigan State leaked the Tucker stuff, they're gonna have to pay him all the money. It could get ugly
it still happened...I don't see the leak as a smoking gun that somehow gets him paid the entire contract.Brenda Tracy said leak came from MSU boardroom
Holy crap... If it turns out someone at Michigan State leaked the Tucker stuff, they're gonna have to pay him all the money. It could get ugly
There will be some kind of settlement. He'll walk away with an undisclosed amount. Maybe a 1/3 or 1/4 of what they owe him.it still happened...I don't see the leak as a smoking gun that somehow gets him paid the entire contract.
thats been my position from the beginning. its just a business decision for both sides.There will be some kind of settlement. He'll walk away with an undisclosed amount. Maybe a 1/3 or 1/4 of what they owe him.
True, but Tucker is already saying this is a ploy to get out of his contract and I think a good amount of people believe that. Everyone laughed at MichSt when they gave him that deal. Like EVERYONE. Then you see issues pop up and now they found a get out of jail card. This likely results in a settlement but to the extent the school went out of their way to claim because Tracey was a vendor they have some Title IX jurisdiction AND then leaked the private investigation then determined they wanted to fire him for cause for bringing ridicule to the school? Like nah yall did that when you leaked the whole thing.it still happened...I don't see the leak as a smoking gun that somehow gets him paid the entire contract.
I don't believe you. Heard this stuff before. Where there's smoke there's fire.I, too, would like to go ahead and announce that I will NOT be taking the Michigan State job.
If I was representing the university, I'd likely tell them to settle with Tucker. This is found money. No need to be greedy. Toss him some $$$ to go away and take that $95 million or whatever they're lucky to save and direct it to a new coach.True, but Tucker is already saying this is a ploy to get out of his contract and I think a good amount of people believe that. Everyone laughed at MichSt when they gave him that deal. Like EVERYONE. Then you see issues pop up and now they found a get out of jail card. This likely results in a settlement but to the extent the school went out of their way to claim because Tracey was a vendor they have some Title IX jurisdiction AND then leaked the private investigation then determined they wanted to fire him for cause for bringing ridicule to the school? Like nah yall did that when you leaked the whole thing.
I'm no lawyer but I would guess most universities would want to steer clear of the notion that every person who we ever paid is covered by Title IX. Also how long would this hold true? Like she came and spoke on campus once and this all happened in the year or two following, if 3 years later he runs into her randomly and they strike up a relationship and she accuses him is the school still going to hold they need to do something under Title IX? How about 5 years? 10? What about a random independent contractor handyman you hired to patch a drywall hole in the wall, if they end up hooking up with a teacher or student years later still title ix issue for the school? I imagine schools want to decrease exposure not increase it.