- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
- Messages
- 3,359
Agree on both. And there a number of things that could obviously be more deeply explored, just a birds eye view of things I was already tracking.What this tells me just at a glance the roster is not as “top heavy” as previous staffs. Top 250 and Top 200 are a positive trend as there is more balance between talent throughout.
The one thing this doesn’t show are the imbalances that happen in recruiting that leads to roster issues down the line and mismanagement of certain positions.
I did toss an average recruit ranking column on here, which I think further speaks to the point about us being less top heavy and having more balance to the classes. Our worst class by average since Mario got here (this year) would be our best of the previous 13 years, other than Richt’s last class.