jd716
Recruit
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2017
- Messages
- 471
I agree, but we have 5 spots and a season to go.I would say something else but i'll be nice and say our star average put us in the 20's. We just have a bunch of commits.
I agree, but we have 5 spots and a season to go.I would say something else but i'll be nice and say our star average put us in the 20's. We just have a bunch of commits.
You know, I'll bite. Tell me specifically which commits you think aren't UM caliber.
I'm no mathematician but I think 7 blue chips and 13 three stars makes it over 50% blue chips.
So...over 50% is by definition a majority.
So according to you by your own words we are on out way to winning a title!!!!!
Have you read any of the threads breaking down Clemson and ND's recruiting classes over the last 6 classes? Chill man, let Manny work.
My guy, read the post again. Rome wasn't built in a day. And ND made the playoffs while we weren't ranked.Clemson last year had 46 blue chips and 24 others on their roster.
LOL at notre dame. Notre dame is a joke.
55 blue chips
50 non blue chips
Compare that to our last two classes
14 blue chips
24 non blue chips
Now you see how far off we are
If you read them then you saw Dabo didn't start getting elite classes for a few years.Yup, great reads. They really explain how important it is to have elite recruiting classes. Clemson has the 4th most 5 stars in the nation and the 3rd least amount of 3 stars. LOL @ Notre Dame, but regardless they still have mainly blue chips on their team.
Yessssssss!!!! Thank you god please let this be forever.Hope Toro does not stand for Toronto
I'm no mathematician but I think 7 blue chips and 13 three stars makes it over 50% blue chips.
So...over 50% is by definition a majority.
So according to you by your own words we are on out way to winning a title!!!!!
If you read them then you saw Dabo didn't start getting elite classes for a few years.
You are incorrect. We are at a 35% blue chip ratio. Also, 50% is the bare minimum needed to be considered elite. If you look at the 3 teams that have made the finals in the past 4 years their blue chip ratio is closer to 75%.
Right now the class is on pace to finish with at least half of it being 4 stars. And that's just with the guys we are rumored to get. Then you have roberts, height, and mammarelli who are all 4 stars on all sites except 1 and are at 88 on the composite. They could get there 4th star with good seasons.I think the OP is bringing up an objectively good point about too many 3* players, or rather, very low graded 3* players in the class
Consider this:
1. We have the lowest avg ranking per commit of any team in the top 15. So yet again we are in the top because of volume, not quality
2. Even if we absolutely hit it out of the park and signed everyone in the class now AND close with Walker, Denis, Worsham, Austin-Cave, Williams and George PLUS we get luckier than we ever have in history and pull Flowe and Washington, we still would likely not even crack the top 5. It might not even beat our 2018 class per 247.
We are depending on evaluations hitting. I think they will hit, especially on the DL. But let’s not pretend we have some juggernaut class right now. It has potential to be great if we hit our evals and we keep our commits (historically not the case).
I think the OPs post is poorly timed. It’s too early before we see what the fall rankings bring. It’s also poorly articulated and comes off as *****y on what should be a good day. The kid we got today is a physical specimen with room to grow. Overall, though, our class is not on track to be elite Top 5 status. We will need some prospects to get a second look from the services
I was fuucking around. I really dont care .
No one is arguing against needing blue chips. The arguement is it took time to build the team.He also ended up having schitty seasons with those non elite classes. By the time he actually made the playoffs his team was stacked with 5 stars so that strengthens the point that you need blue chips to win big.
Everyone has a short window in a p5 school now a days. I understand the blue chip ratio and I’m not disputing it. But trying to compare what Meyer and saban did is a tall task for anyone.He did land a top class. He had the #1 rated class on rivals. 247 wasnt around. Scout rated miami’s class #1, which is actually an example of a class being overrated because of the amount of kids signed. Miami signed the same amount of kids, yet Saban signed NINE more blue chip recruits than miami did that year. 75% of saban’s class were blue chip recruits. That class was absurd and is actually one of the best classes in cfb history. Bringing up Saban’s #1 overall 2008 class is comical
It is easy to comprehend. Im not even down on manny. He just isnt an A+ recruiter yet. He’s not like Meyer, who came into UF and landed the #1 class. He is not doing what he needs to be doing on the trail to put hs in position to compete.He will have to win recruiting battles by doing well on the field, so his window is short.