I think you would have too many 5 stars if that definition held up. The thing is that SC and Miami recruited many players across the country that weren’t elite. Many times it had more to do with both program’s overall standing with recruits than anything else. It also has to do with that particular cycle, the team’s needs and the prospects available. Miami being in SFLA, there are very few times where we need to go beyond 200 miles for a recruit but even then it still happens. ****, we went after Keyshawn Smiff and while a nice prospect I wouldn’t call him elite.
No, not really.
Smiff isn’t relevant. He was recruited two years ago. And who were his other offers?
I’m referring to 20-30+ years ago, and even before. SC and Miami weren’t recruiting players on the other side of the country
unless they believed the player was elite. They weren’t spending the money they are today scouring the country. Recruiting ‘services‘ were guys like Larry Blustein and local writers across the country.
I’m referring to a player‘s number of offers and from who. A player from San Diego offered by all the PAC teams, plus Miami, FSU, Penn State, Notre Dame, Michigan, Ohio State, Alabama, Oklahoma, Texas, etc. Schools with access to a wealth of talent in their ‘general recruiting base’ and reached out across the nation only if they believed a player was elite.
These were the players thought of as a 5*, although I don’t recall if that was a term used back then.
Now, with all the 7-7 leagues, national and regional camps, social media, and click-bait sites the ratings are seemingly made by amateurs, likely on information collected from low-level sources at programs or from the players real or alleged offers.
Some schools are known to flood the market, so to speak, with offers, further skewing the star system.