He saying the same **** we've been saying since SeptemberHe’s not wrong.
Lingard would’ve started in this offense no question
Lingard would’ve started in this offense no question
So that means he would have been 5th string b/c you are the worst talent evaluator on CIS .... and that's nearly impossible to do consider all of the idiots in here.
And he's as stiff as Tim Hardaway in a *** bar.Definite questions...The kid has the vision of a blind man.
Saddest part of this sorry fanbase is we’re running about 40% of the replies on here saying good stuff about the gaytor. I don’t care how much you hate Manure, but if you got even a shred of positivity for the gaytor you’re degenerate, guttersnipe trash. Tells me you trashbags aren’t even UM fans if you got any light at all for gaytor.
Definite questions...The kid has the vision of a blind man.
I’d bet my money he won’tso if he balls out there, was it him or us that caused him to fail here?
Vs savanna st..his vision looked “elite”?Vision looked elite from what I saw Lingards freshman year under Richts offense
ExactlyYou blame the coaches for being unable to get Lo game ready and contributing. I'm pretty sure the point of "What about Dallas?" was, well, Dallas on paper doesn't have nearly the ceiling Lo has, yet he went and balled out this year. So if Lo only failed because of the coaching staff, why did Dallas do so well under the same staff? Maybe some of that blame deserves to be on Lo's shoulders too then, no?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's how I took his post.
Agree up to a point.Also Dan Enos who was hired because of the job he did on Alabama. Let's be real here.
Alabama ever since Nick Saban took over has one of the best college rosters every year. He obviously knows what to look for each holiday period. The high school recruiting cycle is like having - at least twenty first round picks in the nfl draft. Instead he just has a eye for the student / athlete. & most people want to be on a winning team. Plus the better the team equals the less wear and tear on a kids body. Just that the great players stand out more and usually get extra playing time.
You also said this, you shouldn’t be trusting your eyes because they are stupid:Vision looked elite from what I saw Lingards freshman year under Richts offense
Barkley not that special.... Mark Walton is more explosive.
Yep they are so much better because they work harder but we were a possession away from winning.
Vision looked elite from what I saw Lingards freshman year under Richts offense