- Joined
- Jun 30, 2017
- Messages
- 2,846
But 4X the fumbles. Either way I’d say both (along with Pratt and lil Tua) are upgrades over TVDriveshack.A quick stat search on google would let u know Ward has less INT’s
But 4X the fumbles. Either way I’d say both (along with Pratt and lil Tua) are upgrades over TVDriveshack.A quick stat search on google would let u know Ward has less INT’s
Ditto with fumbles buddy. That's why I said interceptions AND fumbles. God some of our fans are so dumbA quick stat search on google would let u know Ward has less INT’s
Yikes you hit send on this.I actually prefer Howard as Ward is a turnover machine with interceptions and fumbles
Speak English pleaseYikes you got send on this.
What if I told you one of these QBs averaged a turnover 1 out of every 29 passes and the other was 1 out of 32?Ditto with fumbles buddy. That's why I said interceptions AND fumbles. God some of our fans are so dumb
I’m sure you’re also aware Washington State averaged 2.6 ypc against FBS teams (131 out of 133 FBS teams) and gave up 39 sacks (123 out of 133 FBS teams)…who knows how many pressures and hurries on top of that.Ditto with fumbles buddy. That's why I said interceptions AND fumbles. God some our fans are so dumb
Yes, it does, I think Howard is a better fit that's all. And I don't buy the talent disadvantageI’m sure you’re also aware Washington State averaged 2.6 ypc against FBS teams (131 out of 133 FBS teams) and gave up 39 sacks (123 out of 133 FBS teams)…who knows how many pressures and hurries on top of that.
Howard is very good imo, Ward is a notch above. Context matters, and when an opposing defense knows you’re one-dimensional + already at a talent disadvantage, it makes what he did that much more impressive imo.
Won’t fight you on the fit, Howard is probably better suited for this offense.Yes, it does, I think Howard is a better fit that's all. And I don't buy the talent disadvantage
Wow, stats don't mean everything. I think Howard is a better fit, you don't. I prefer Gabriel but that's a pipe dreamWhat if I told you one of these QBs averaged a turnover 1 out of every 29 passes and the other was 1 out of 32?
I do prefer Ward but I don't understand calling fans idiots over made up logic. If Ward is turnover prone so is Howard. Howard was actually more turnover prone in 2023.Wow, stats don't mean everything. I think Howard is a better fit, you don't. I prefer Gabriel but that's a pipe dream
Yeah, that definitely would be hard to pull off... you're a crazy man!I know this may sound crazy and it’s witch craft but they could play together in 10 personnel. I know I know I’m talking crazy
Just pulled the numbers and since 247 began tracking the decommits (2012) Miami has had 12 players decommit (not sure about committing somewhere else in between) then re-commit.Jeez I totally forgot he committed to Oregon too. So two guys did that since 06 or 07 whenever Demarcus Van Dyke came here.
Either should be very good options.Interesting that Howard is above Ward based on this perspective
A quick stat search on google would let u know Ward has less INT’s
ThanksOP the goat
Sacks aren't just an oline stat - it's a qb stat too.I’m sure you’re also aware Washington State averaged 2.6 ypc against FBS teams (131 out of 133 FBS teams) and gave up 39 sacks (123 out of 133 FBS teams)…who knows how many pressures and hurries on top of that.
Howard is very good imo, Ward is a notch above. Context matters, and when an opposing defense knows you’re one-dimensional + already at a talent disadvantage, it makes what he did that much more impressive imo.
Ward is much better than Howard. Most of Ward’s turnovers happen when he has pressure in his face. Behind a good O line, this kid will THRIVE. He’s the prize. Mario needs to do everything in his power to get this kid.I actually prefer Howard as Ward is a turnover machine with interceptions and fumbles
Because I clearly stated interceptions AND fumbles and he told me a quick Google search would show Howard had more interceptions. Ward had 11 fumbles and lost 7 plus 7 interceptions = 14 turnovers. Howard had 10 interceptions and 1 fumble = 10 turnovers. In what universe is 10 turnovers more turnover prone than 14 turnovers?I do prefer Ward but I don't understand calling fans idiots over made up logic. If Ward is turnover prone so is Howard. Howard was actually more turnover prone in 2023.
That's your opinion, and while I may be in the minority, I prefer Howard over Ward. I want Gabriel but doubt that will happenWard is much better than Howard. Most of Ward’s turnovers happen when he has pressure in his face. Behind a good O line, this kid will THRIVE. He’s the prize. Mario needs to do everything in his power to get this kid.
10 and 1 certainly does not = 10 turnovers, but Howard lost 2 fumbles. Howard had over 100 less pass attempts and only 3 less turnovers. Meaning if he had the same volume of passes as Ward he would have had more. His turnover ratio was 29:1 vs 32:1 for Ward. Simple math.Because I clearly stated interceptions AND fumbles and he told me a quick Google search would show Howard had more interceptions. Ward had 11 fumbles and lost 7 plus 7 interceptions = 14 turnovers. Howard had 10 interceptions and 1 fumble = 10 turnovers. In what universe is 10 turnovers more turnover prone than 14 turnovers?