Kris Bogle

[bobbydigius]

Groom Weaver next year and in 2020 he’ll backup Rousseau.

I see Weaver as a 280+ DE that will set the edge. Similar to a Major 9.

 

[SWFLSWAGG17]

I see Weaver as a 280+ DE that will set the edge. Similar to a Major 6.

Major 6?

 

[glazed67]

Major 6?

If 6 was 9

 

[bobbydigius]

Major 6?

Derpity derp. My fault

 

[brock]

Just checked the crystal balls to Miami and I find credible the recent two because tom loy knows his sh*t on the recruiting scene and Clint Brewster is the son of Tim Brewster former FSU coach who is now at Texas a&m who just hosted bogle on an official visit so that’s pretty interesting if you ask me

 

[dedostheibis]

Would be huge for this class

 

[PGrady24]

How many DE do we want to sign? I know we are projecting to take 4 DT, would 4 DE be too many? If we were to get Bogle and Weaver, do we drop Williams?

Don't tell me "stack chips", we also need a scholarship distribution at each position. 8 on the defensive line seems high IMO

 

[orange&green84]

How many DE do we want to sign? I know we are projecting to take 4 DT, would 4 DE be too many? If we were to get Bogle and Weaver, do we drop Williams?

Don't tell me "stack chips", we also need a scholarship distribution at each position. 8 on the defensive line seems high IMO

4 would not be too many and here's why:

We had to move McCray to DE, but he graduates after this season. We're going to lose D. Jackson and possibly Joe Jackson to the NFL. So we're losing 3 DE's. We are also short on the number that you typically should have. So 4 is ideal. On top of that, Harvey's elite and Williams looks like he'll be decent. If Bogle wants in, you take him because well, he's elite. If Weaver wants in, you definitely take him. So that's my wish list 4 DE's.

 

[CaneQueDrew]

Richt just sent out his version of the “bat signal”, but I haven’t seen anyone else say anything.....

 

[PGrady24]

4 would not be too many and here's why:

We had to move McCray to DE, but he graduates after this season. We're going to lose D. Jackson and possibly Joe Jackson to the NFL. So we're losing 3 DE's. We are also short on the number that you typically should have. So 4 is ideal. On top of that, Harvey's elite and Williams looks like he'll be decent. If Bogle wants in, you take him because well, he's elite. If Weaver wants in, you definitely take him. So that's my wish list 4 DE's.

That's a good point. Man our numbers are thin there at DE and DT, not good.

 

[Drewny1]

4 would not be too many and here's why:

We had to move McCray to DE, but he graduates after this season. We're going to lose D. Jackson and possibly Joe Jackson to the NFL. So we're losing 3 DE's. We are also short on the number that you typically should have. So 4 is ideal. On top of that, Harvey's elite and Williams looks like he'll be decent. If Bogle wants in, you take him because well, he's elite. If Weaver wants in, you definitely take him. So that's my wish list 4 DE's.

DE - Harvey, Williams, Bogle, Weaver
DT - Munoz, Blissett, Ingraham, Holley and Davis if he wants in.

 

[PGrady24]

DE - Harvey, Williams, Bogle, Weaver
DT - Munoz, Blissett, Ingraham, Another DT

Drop Holley?

 

[Drewny1]

Drop Holley?

Ahh thats who I was forgetting, Thanks

 

[brock]

That's a good point. Man our numbers are thin there at DE and DT, not good.

Yeah they are thin which is why we need a big dt/de class

 

[Zbrod95]

I see Weaver as a 280+ DE that will set the edge. Similar to a Major 9.

JJ looks more athletic than than chad. I believe he’s gonna be the best DE in this class.

 

[nycane]

Drop Holley?

why? im not an expert on DT talent but i like what i see from him. plus, opens a georgia pipeline

 

[PGrady24]

why? im not an expert on DT talent but i like what i see from him. plus, opens a georgia pipeline

I was referring to Drewny1's post where he forgot about Holley. I think he's a take

 

[nycane]

I was referring to Drewny1's post where he forgot about Holley. I think he's a take

oh my bad lol

 

[Drewny1]

I think he is a take also, I just forgot his name

 

[Drewny1]

Holley is #90 for Buford. He is defintaly a 1 tech but he plays was too high. If we are going to take Holley, we probably should have kept Daxon.