1. I'm not sure how to answer that. Are you referring to getting on kids early when you say "early offers"? Like in reference to the two 2022 kids I have?
2. Golden's staff actually wasn't that bad. Paul Williams was a goof and Golden came across as a used car salesman but Hurley, D'Onofrio and a couple other guys were cool dudes. (just turns out they couldn't coach) They actually attempted to make the HS guys feel at home though, at least in the handful of times that I was there. Their main issue in regards to recruiting was EVALUATION. And Diaz staff as a whole may not be bad. But having a coaching clinic at your school, and not doing a good job of "chopping it up" with coaches, that's not a good look. Even Golden's staff made sure they walked the room and talked ball with the HS coaches. Now, I give credit to Miami's staff for even having a UM coaching clinic. That was cool. But that **** is common. It's nothing forward-thinking. It's the way you interact WITH the coaches during these events that really matters. I'M NOT SAYING THAT THEY WERE BAD, they just weren't as detailed or personable as other staffs I've been around. And from what I've been told, this is how they are with the kids sometimes.
3. Our Head Coach plans to communicate these issues with Miami. He said it yesterday. He wants to have a "sit down" with them. We're all tired of the anti-Miami stereotype and the only way to fix it is to get Miami to recruit our school better. Period. There's no reason that they shouldn't be on top of our young prospects right now while Bama, Auburn, etc already are. Makes no sense. They're already behind with two elite 2022 kids.
4. The fact that he's only been on the job for 6 months and we're just coming off of a terrible season should only make their staff MORE AGGRESSIVE. People in here have said that "UCF's staff has to be like that because they're UCF." Well no ****, they're trying to build something! Miami should be that way right now as well! They've been a joke for years and have a lot of catching up to do. Sitting around UCF's staff (for example) you get the sense that they're hungry. They're leaving no stone un-turned. Again, I could explain in more detail but then I'll just be accused of wanting attention, when that's not what it's about. It's about creating relationships that may pay dividends.
@Coach Macho , it's all good, I hope my questions didn't make it seem like I'm one of the guys criticizing you. I AM NOT. I value your opinions and I don't think you want the "attention". Unfortunately, when you posted, you said "even if it makes me look like a d!ck", and some of these guys are trying to take you up on that. Don't worry about what they say, don't respond to every single guy, I understand what you are saying and I don't think you are making this all about you, just trying to give us insight into how the kids and coaches feel.
On the issue of getting on kids early and/or early offers (not sure if they are always the same thing), I would break it into a few parts. First, you mention your 2022 kids - do you think Miami coaches are "behind" because we have had coaching turnover, or do you think that Miami intentionally tries to hold off on early offers (regardless of which coaching staff it is)? And in the past, if we have "not been on a kid early" and/or not giving out an early offer, was it due to the newness of the coaches under Golden and/or Richt? For instance, Golden brought a ton of coaches from outside of the SoFla area, who had never really recruited top SoFla talent until they got here.
I think my overall takeaway on early "on a kid" and early offers is this - for UM, is it a question of coaching turnover or coaching arrogance (or possibly just bad evals and lack of confidence), and if SEC programs are doing it better than we are, are they assisted by coaching stability or are they just taking a lot of gambles on SoFla kids early, hoping to hit jackpots? I'm trying to figure out how we turn our obvious asset (SoFla talent goldmine) back into a true strength. I'm not against going out and finding talent outside of SoFla, but if we don't need to...
And, ultimately, since we have seen a lot of...hesitation...for SoFla kids to re-trust Miami, it would be nice to find the right balance between tangible (wins, facilities, etc.) and intangible (relationships, etc.). I am having a hard time understanding how some of these kids can project a level of trust and confidence in Taggart's ability to turn things around, yet Miami has to go above-and-beyond to get kids to buy into our program's turnaround.
Don't let these guys get you down, Coach, I appreciate what you bring.