No clue, brother.
Kehoe said the same thing.
Sure did...
Yup...Too me anyway...Dont think Art doesn't know FB....
As I have...Love Frank...always will...But what I saw Freddie Miles do on the Gridiron in 79...Is something that is still ingrained in my Brain...If ya think Gore was Quick hitting a hole...Freddie was not only quicker...but Faster as well...Talk about a complete waste of talent....The Late Joe Brodsky who coached RBs for UM and the Cowboys (when Emmitt was there) said on more than one occasion, that Freddie was the Best RB he ever saw, regardless of Age....Don Soldinger (till this very day) says the same thing....Thats how good he was...If there's any doubt...ask Soldinger (like I did)....Haunts me that much potential was ruined...Think about this....In 1979 Freddie, Not Bo Jackson...Not Marcus Dupree..and not Hershall Walker was the #1 Ranked HS RB in America...That tells ya all you need to know...Ask anyone 50 and older from Dade bout Freddie, and watch the look on their face...
Lingard was also an EE, while cam was not. Them stats are so small of a sample size that u can't even consider them.
Tell that to the people who are crowning Cam as the better RB.
I'm very neutral on this subject, as if right now I think they are equally good backs who are better at different things than the other. My only problem is that if people are going to say one is better than the other then provide good reasoning. To respond to ur statement I see majority people say Lingard is better becuase he is bigger and faster, which to me does not make a RB better. Only time will tell and as of rn I dont think people can come to the conclusion that one is better than the other.
I see more people saying Cam is the better RB. Some of those people are on this thread, some on YouTube/social media. All that is is recency bias. Same way people are on the Mallory bandwagon ever since Brevin went down. From what I've seen, no matter how little or how large of a sample size, Zo and Brevin are the best at their position.
I did not know people were claiming that about Mallory and Jordan. But if I had to have an opinion on that subject I would say the same thing about what I said about Lingard and Cam, one is better at other things than the other. Brevin is more agile, probably a better route runner, and was physically ready coming out of high school. Mallory is taller has better long speed and probably is more of a redzone threat.
I did not know people were saying that about Mallory or Jordan. That being said, if I had to give an opinion on that subject I would say the same thing; both are better at different things than the other. Brevin is more agile, probably a better route runner, and was more physically ready coming out of college thus making him a better blocker as well. Mallory is taller, better long speed, good at route running but not as good as Brevin, and is more of a redzone threat, and is now a solid blocker. That being said, I don't want to get into a conversation of who is better i just want to agree that UM as 2 headed monsters at TE and RB. we can agree to disagree as well.