- Joined
- May 14, 2016
- Messages
- 35,486
The criticisms of Kendal are valid.
Here’s the caveat, between Kendal, Joe Brady & Ken Dorsey, which of the 3 has the least amount of valid criticisms as it pertains to their play calling as an OC?
Well, one of them has never been an OC or called plays & the other wasn’t an OC in college, but is credited with LSU’s historic offensive success & parlayed that into a NFL OC job only to be subsequently fired shortly thereafter.
In terms of experience, Kendal as a play caller is vastly more experienced than both Brady & Dorsey.
His style of offense being the Veer & Shoot isn’t necessarily an Innocent OJ glove fit for our personnel, but he however has displayed versatility in his career being able to adjust & adapt to several different styles of QB’s while he probably rather prefers to have a mobile QB.
Briles has had success at every stop in which he’s been an OC & there’s proven evidence that his plays work & have repeatedly worked, so the only drawback really is what he would do with an all-conference caliber QB & a ton of speed & young playmakers at WR & TE.
Briles isn’t my top choice, but I’m on board fully with him as OC because that’s as innovative & creative as we’re going to get with an OC with Mario at the helm. If you examine all the previous OC’s Mario has had at FIU & Oregon, Briles is about 100 miles ahead of all of them & as far outside the box he would have ever gone if Briles ends up getting hired.
Bring him here all day & figure out the rest later, trust me, we can do a whole **** of a lot worse than Briles.
Here’s the caveat, between Kendal, Joe Brady & Ken Dorsey, which of the 3 has the least amount of valid criticisms as it pertains to their play calling as an OC?
Well, one of them has never been an OC or called plays & the other wasn’t an OC in college, but is credited with LSU’s historic offensive success & parlayed that into a NFL OC job only to be subsequently fired shortly thereafter.
In terms of experience, Kendal as a play caller is vastly more experienced than both Brady & Dorsey.
His style of offense being the Veer & Shoot isn’t necessarily an Innocent OJ glove fit for our personnel, but he however has displayed versatility in his career being able to adjust & adapt to several different styles of QB’s while he probably rather prefers to have a mobile QB.
Briles has had success at every stop in which he’s been an OC & there’s proven evidence that his plays work & have repeatedly worked, so the only drawback really is what he would do with an all-conference caliber QB & a ton of speed & young playmakers at WR & TE.
Briles isn’t my top choice, but I’m on board fully with him as OC because that’s as innovative & creative as we’re going to get with an OC with Mario at the helm. If you examine all the previous OC’s Mario has had at FIU & Oregon, Briles is about 100 miles ahead of all of them & as far outside the box he would have ever gone if Briles ends up getting hired.
Bring him here all day & figure out the rest later, trust me, we can do a whole **** of a lot worse than Briles.