FinsFishandCaneS
Freshman
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 437
There's some buzz going around.....12 schollies over 4 years.....no bowl ban. Limits' on visits blah blah. If true, i'll take it.
sk8
Yerp
There's some buzz going around.....12 schollies over 4 years.....no bowl ban. Limits' on visits blah blah. If true, i'll take it.
sk8
Whatever the sanctions are we need to accept them and never look back.
Absolutely not! Big surprise gamineal liked your post. Troll and Troll.
12 schollies over 4 years.
That's 12% of our adjusted gross. That's not peanuts.
This. It's the 4 years that really hurts us. That's an awful long time to deal with scholly limits. IF, say, that rumor were true then
This year, we can have 85 athletes
In 2014 we could have 82 athletes
In 2015 we could have 79 athletes
In 2016 we could have 76 athletes
In 2017 we could have 73 athletes!!
Usually with these scholarship reductions, they don't allow you to make up for attrition either, so chances are we would be in the 60's.
So we're trying to build for the future, but with only 73 athletes on scholarship in 2017 we literally would have no depth at all. Then, in 2018, we would have to sign a MONSTER class, bringing in 35+ kids.
2018 would be a repeat of last year.
It basically screws our program for a long time moving forward.
12 schollies over 4 years.
That's 12% of our adjusted gross. That's not peanuts.
This. It's the 4 years that really hurts us. That's an awful long time to deal with scholly limits. IF, say, that rumor were true then
This year, we can have 85 athletes
In 2014 we could have 82 athletes
In 2015 we could have 79 athletes
In 2016 we could have 76 athletes
In 2017 we could have 73 athletes!!
Usually with these scholarship reductions, they don't allow you to make up for attrition either, so chances are we would be in the 60's.
So we're trying to build for the future, but with only 73 athletes on scholarship in 2017 we literally would have no depth at all. Then, in 2018, we would have to sign a MONSTER class, bringing in 35+ kids.
2018 would be a repeat of last year.
It basically screws our program for a long time moving forward.
You must be using that Florida State math.
We, also could choose to use all 12 in one year and be done with it.
You are also allowed to sign 28, with the assumption that some wont qualify.
We can also do like we did when we got hammered for the pell grants, and give academic scholarships.
I might be wrong on this, but I seem to remember Dan Morgan initially playing with us on a non football scholarship.
I'd throw it in the NCAA's face and sign 22 a year to football scholarships, then give academic rides to 3 guys with 820 SAT's and call the 3 national recruits walk ons.
12 schollies over 4 years.
That's 12% of our adjusted gross. That's not peanuts.
This. It's the 4 years that really hurts us. That's an awful long time to deal with scholly limits. IF, say, that rumor were true then
This year, we can have 85 athletes
In 2014 we could have 82 athletes
In 2015 we could have 79 athletes
In 2016 we could have 76 athletes
In 2017 we could have 73 athletes!!
Usually with these scholarship reductions, they don't allow you to make up for attrition either, so chances are we would be in the 60's.
So we're trying to build for the future, but with only 73 athletes on scholarship in 2017 we literally would have no depth at all. Then, in 2018, we would have to sign a MONSTER class, bringing in 35+ kids.
2018 would be a repeat of last year.
It basically screws our program for a long time moving forward.
You must be using that Florida State math.
We, also could choose to use all 12 in one year and be done with it.
You are also allowed to sign 28, with the assumption that some wont qualify.
We can also do like we did when we got hammered for the pell grants, and give academic scholarships.
I might be wrong on this, but I seem to remember Dan Morgan initially playing with us on a non football scholarship.
I'd throw it in the NCAA's face and sign 22 a year to football scholarships, then give academic rides to 3 guys with 820 SAT's and call the 3 national recruits walk ons.
Whatever the sanctions are we need to accept them and never look back.
Absolutely not! Big surprise gamineal liked your post. Troll and Troll.
**** you....when they come down with their so called penalties you gonna cry and run to mommy dearest I wouldnt think so......We have to move on and get ready for FAU....99% of the REAL fans have started looking forward and not looked back....Al has been preaching this since 2011 move on, nothing you or I or anyone can do..NOTHING..so butch up and lets what you are made of when the day comes...Rok and I will be waiting ooops Trolling...BTW I liked your post
Call ace, he'll clear this up with the quickness.
12 schollies over 4 years.
That's 12% of our adjusted gross. That's not peanuts.
This. It's the 4 years that really hurts us. That's an awful long time to deal with scholly limits. IF, say, that rumor were true then
This year, we can have 85 athletes
In 2014 we could have 82 athletes
In 2015 we could have 79 athletes
In 2016 we could have 76 athletes
In 2017 we could have 73 athletes!!
Usually with these scholarship reductions, they don't allow you to make up for attrition either, so chances are we would be in the 60's.
So we're trying to build for the future, but with only 73 athletes on scholarship in 2017 we literally would have no depth at all. Then, in 2018, we would have to sign a MONSTER class, bringing in 35+ kids.
2018 would be a repeat of last year.
It basically screws our program for a long time moving forward.
You must be using that Florida State math.
We, also could choose to use all 12 in one year and be done with it.
You are also allowed to sign 28, with the assumption that some wont qualify.
We can also do like we did when we got hammered for the pell grants, and give academic scholarships.
I might be wrong on this, but I seem to remember Dan Morgan initially playing with us on a non football scholarship.
I'd throw it in the NCAA's face and sign 22 a year to football scholarships, then give academic rides to 3 guys with 820 SAT's and call the 3 national recruits walk ons.
@Ernie you realize that's a 30 scholarship deduction right? Lol donna ain't having that ****!
Whatever the sanctions are we need to accept them and never look back.
Absolutely not! Big surprise gamineal liked your post. Troll and Troll.
**** you....when they come down with their so called penalties you gonna cry and run to mommy dearest I wouldnt think so......We have to move on and get ready for FAU....99% of the REAL fans have started looking forward and not looked back....Al has been preaching this since 2011 move on, nothing you or I or anyone can do..NOTHING..so butch up and lets what you are made of when the day comes...Rok and I will be waiting ooops Trolling...BTW I liked your post
An appeal like S. Florida did was hardly a distraction. It helped them a bunch too. If all we get is some scolly losses unless its vary minor we have nothing to lose at all. Won't effect who we have or who we get. Take it up the butt n move on is hardly the Canes style. But it seems minor to you because u like it up the butt.
12 schollies over 4 years.
That's 12% of our adjusted gross. That's not peanuts.
This. It's the 4 years that really hurts us. That's an awful long time to deal with scholly limits. IF, say, that rumor were true then
This year, we can have 85 athletes
In 2014 we could have 82 athletes
In 2015 we could have 79 athletes
In 2016 we could have 76 athletes
In 2017 we could have 73 athletes!!
Usually with these scholarship reductions, they don't allow you to make up for attrition either, so chances are we would be in the 60's.
So we're trying to build for the future, but with only 73 athletes on scholarship in 2017 we literally would have no depth at all. Then, in 2018, we would have to sign a MONSTER class, bringing in 35+ kids.
2018 would be a repeat of last year.
It basically screws our program for a long time moving forward.
You must be using that Florida State math.
We, also could choose to use all 12 in one year and be done with it.
You are also allowed to sign 28, with the assumption that some wont qualify.
We can also do like we did when we got hammered for the pell grants, and give academic scholarships.
I might be wrong on this, but I seem to remember Dan Morgan initially playing with us on a non football scholarship.
I'd throw it in the NCAA's face and sign 22 a year to football scholarships, then give academic rides to 3 guys with 820 SAT's and call the 3 national recruits walk ons.
@Ernie you realize that's a 30 scholarship deduction right? Lol donna ain't having that ****!
Man I hope you guys are right cause if it's really just 3 a year, 82 cap, we'll barely notice that.
I thought I remembered that it compounds every year though, so it's 3 ADDITIONAL schollies every year. Anyways, we'll see. Hopefully I'm wrong.
Also.... rudebuddha..... I think they closed the track scholarship loophole. Man we abused the **** out of that one last time lulz. Santana Moss wasn't on a football scholarship? Hahahaha.
Hope we can find another loophole again.
. Beyond loaded. Which is why him taking the money is beyond stupid, even if the rule is stupid as well.Let's see what they do to Johnny Football! No way that SOB didn't get compensated for signing over 4000 items.
White kid, drives a mercedes, Texas A&M, SEC..... Nothing to see here.
FYI , the family is loaded
Absolutely ridiculous. When the NCAA fixes themselves, this has to be a case study on how not to operate an investigation. These people running this are boarder line retarded.
This. It's the 4 years that really hurts us. That's an awful long time to deal with scholly limits. IF, say, that rumor were true then
This year, we can have 85 athletes
In 2014 we could have 82 athletes
In 2015 we could have 79 athletes
In 2016 we could have 76 athletes
In 2017 we could have 73 athletes!!
Usually with these scholarship reductions, they don't allow you to make up for attrition either, so chances are we would be in the 60's.
So we're trying to build for the future, but with only 73 athletes on scholarship in 2017 we literally would have no depth at all. Then, in 2018, we would have to sign a MONSTER class, bringing in 35+ kids.
2018 would be a repeat of last year.
It basically screws our program for a long time moving forward.
You must be using that Florida State math.
We, also could choose to use all 12 in one year and be done with it.
You are also allowed to sign 28, with the assumption that some wont qualify.
We can also do like we did when we got hammered for the pell grants, and give academic scholarships.
I might be wrong on this, but I seem to remember Dan Morgan initially playing with us on a non football scholarship.
I'd throw it in the NCAA's face and sign 22 a year to football scholarships, then give academic rides to 3 guys with 820 SAT's and call the 3 national recruits walk ons.
@Ernie you realize that's a 30 scholarship deduction right? Lol donna ain't having that ****!
Man I hope you guys are right cause if it's really just 3 a year, 82 cap, we'll barely notice that.
I thought I remembered that it compounds every year though, so it's 3 ADDITIONAL schollies every year. Anyways, we'll see. Hopefully I'm wrong.
Also.... rudebuddha..... I think they closed the track scholarship loophole. Man we abused the **** out of that one last time lulz. Santana Moss wasn't on a football scholarship? Hahahaha.
Hope we can find another loophole again.
Dude, academic scholarships.
Find some beastly athletes who, intellectually, would make Devin Hester look like Stephen Hawking.
Community college grads, who scored like a 440 on the SAT in high school, but somehow got that Associates Degree.
Bring their asses in.
Might go against our principles.
Just saw a cnnsi.com article on football and academics. Miami was top 5 in graduation % something like 94%.
For all you people who say our standards are too high. The article said Stanford requires all their commits to complete at least 2 AP classes their senior year.
Makes our 820 SAT requirement seem pretty minor.
Absolutely ridiculous. When the NCAA fixes themselves, this has to be a case study on how not to operate an investigation. These people running this are boarder line retarded.
Oh the irony.
Absolutely ridiculous. When the NCAA fixes themselves, this has to be a case study on how not to operate an investigation. These people running this are boarder line retarded.
Oh the irony.
What's that? The NCAA fixing themselves?
I don't believe the scholarships compound. Oregan lost 3 scholarship, 1 a year I believe. We just need to win the games.