0 excuse to not win the coastal this year. Manny has the pieces in place. Any decent coach can go undefeated in the regular season with this team and our schedule. We do what we are suppose to do, and we will have a really good class.
The only loss I could accept is VT at Blacksburg because it’s hard to play there but other than that Manny needs to go if he can’t get to 11-12 wins. With Williams now the only question is LT to go with One of the most dynamic QBs in the country, 2 future NFL TEs, a good veteran back with 2 highly talented freshmen behind him, 2 legit first round talents playing the edge with 2 potential NFL in the middle, and an NFL backend to help our corners. This team ain’t perfect but it’s still the 2nd most talented team in the ACC.
I can respect and appreciate the buy-in to the talent on this team. I, too, believe it is the most talented team we have had in recent memory, with the best QB and most exciting offensive scheme we have had around here in a while. And obviously, I can't say what any other fan will find "acceptable" or not for this team.
That being said, most sports (and even college football) just do not work as described above. Teams with more talent will occasionally lose to less talented teams. Because what is critical isn't that a team has "more" talent, but what the talent disparity is. And of course, things like coaching (corching?), match-ups, scheme, injuries, the weather, etc... also come into play. But even then, favorites lose games... at a pretty decent rate. Gamblers know this, and there is a reason Vegas puts UM's win total at 9. That's why even if your team is the favorite literally every single game they play, seasonal win totals are typically still less than "undefeated" or "one-loss."
If you have a minute, check out this
chart by Jimmy Boyd. He looked at underdog winning rates in college football for games going back to 1980 and collected some interesting data. For example, out of 713 games where a team was a 6 point favorite, the underdog won 1/3 of the time (238 games). Even 12-point favorites (382) were still managing to lose outright just over 1/5 of the time (80). Even crazier, 25 point underdogs managed to win nearly 5% of the time. I haven't seen any weekly spreads yet for college games, but I would guess many, if not most, of UM's games will fall within a 12-point spread.
And though I generally think it's trash (especially in the pre-season), if you go by E$PN's FPI, UM is currently projected at 6.6 regular season wins (sad
link). E$PN, overall, does eat a magical bag of endless d!cks. And if we somehow manage to win only 7 regular season games, Diaz should just be fired... he should be fired out of a giant canon into space. But the point is, outside of CIS, people around college football aren't saying UM is an 11-win or undefeated team.
Maybe that takes into account Diaz being a liability at HC at this stage in his career. It's definitely possible and undeniably part of the calculus. But I suspect it has more to do with our historical performance and the fact our talent, while certainly better than most of the ACC, isn't so head-and-shoulders better so as to think any of our conference games will be a stroll in the park.
*Caveat: I'm not sure how current the Boyd numbers are, but here's a
Link to another article published in June 2014 with pretty similar numbers. And according to
this 2018 article looking at approximately 40 years of college football games, underdogs won outright (regardless of spread) 5,553 underdogs (or 22.8%). Teams that should win lose all the time. So even if we are favored every game (I don't think we will be), it doesn't mean the expectation should be that we win every game.