- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,063
I’m strictly talking their games , being Sr guys , sizes , and late round pick types. There’s a lot in common. Green improved his three point shooting from the low 30’s then jumped into the low 40’s his last year. I believe Jordan was in the mid 30’s. Once again comparable. This has nothing to do with what they were as recruits. This is a prospect comparison at the next level. Danny was a nobody at the next level that was bouncing back and forth from the nba to developmental for years , until his worked paid off. Imo Jordan‘s ceiling could be the same type role player. Three and D / effort can keep you around a long time.Idk about some of this. As a recruit and a collegian, Green was not an underdog. He was the #31 overall player coming out of HS, played for a blue blood, won a national title. He shot 42% from 3 his senior year.
I understand that he had to battle to find a role as a 2nd round pick, and he was a bench player at UNC until his senior year. He definitely had to grind to have the NBA career he did.
But Miller's story is quite different. He was not highly recruited at all (had offers from Mason, Drexel, Campbell, etc.), and transferred to an ACC school with very little history, coming off 3 straight terrible years. He was "the most underrated player in America", as L often said. Being all ACC, becoming a household name in March, and looking like a potential draft pick is an incredible rise for him.
Last edited: