Johnny Football Suspend for the 1st Half of Rice game

"The NCAA has acknowledged Manziel did not receive money for signing autographs, the source said."

So let me get this straight. The NCAA has heard from multiple people, who's job it is to buy/sell autographs that they paid him for signatures. Yet, after his denial they acquiesce and agree he didn't.

BUT they'll take the word of a felon and liar as long as he said something twice....

Hmmm... nevermind, I guess this makes sense afterall

Manzel and Shapiro both said it twice , sooo
 
Advertisement
the general consensus was that he wasn't going to be punished. Most people kept saying "where's the evidence" and "how do you prove this?" Just wondering how in the **** that same logic isn't used in our case.
 
"The NCAA has acknowledged Manziel did not receive money for signing autographs, the source said."

So let me get this straight. The NCAA has heard from multiple people, who's job it is to buy/sell autographs that they paid him for signatures. Yet, after his denial they acquiesce and agree he didn't.

BUT they'll take the word of a felon and liar as long as he said something twice....

Hmmm... nevermind, I guess this makes sense afterall
Johnny must have denied it twice.

dammit, bb beat me to it.
 
Clearly you both missed the joke...

"The NCAA has acknowledged Manziel did not receive money for signing autographs, the source said."

So let me get this straight. The NCAA has heard from multiple people, who's job it is to buy/sell autographs that they paid him for signatures. Yet, after his denial they acquiesce and agree he didn't.

BUT they'll take the word of a felon and liar as long as he said something twice....

Hmmm... nevermind, I guess this makes sense afterall

Manzel and Shapiro both said it twice , sooo
 
He shouldn't have been suspended at all, but the NCAA couldn't look like a ***** so they slapped half a game.
 
Advertisement
the general consensus was that he wasn't going to be punished. Most people kept saying "where's the evidence" and "how do you prove this?" Just wondering how in the **** that same logic isn't used in our case.

The answer is as clear as Black and White.
 
LULZ

We had guys suspended for six games for accepting a Big Burrito Supreme from Taco Bell and this guy will miss a half of a game after raking in significant money. Nice!

That **** is incredible I would love to see someone on espn bring that **** up.
 
Advertisement
This really couldn't work out better for either side. The NCAA gets to pretend they punished someone for breaking the rules. A&M gets to play a scrimmage game and have JM return in the 2nd half to get some snaps in for the game that matters the following week. Wonder what their approach would've been if they were playing an actual team week one.
 
As it relates to being fraudulent.............NCAA>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>gas prices, health care, government, They might as well make Nevin the president in waiting, for when Emmert retires. That way they won't miss a beat.
 
Yo if anyone cant see that the SEC and NCAA are in bed together then ur fkin retarded. Now back to the Miami case and death penalty for going to chucky cheese
 
ESPN won't say ****!

I just hope Dez Bryant stirs some **** up, because he is going to be ****ed! Somebody with a voice needs to bring this up!
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
NCAA: Hey Johnny, how's it goin?

Johnny: Good.

NCAA: Johnny, did you take money for the autographs you signed?

Johnny: Nah, man, nah.

NCAA: You sure, Johnny?

Johnny: Yup.

NCAA: Cool, thanks.
 
They acknowledge he didn't take money but he is suspended for the first half. Something is missing here.
 
As long as they keep handing out light punishments I'm fine, because ours in coming up soon. I think no more bowl bans and 1-5 scholarships a year fir the 2 years would be fine.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top