SCarolina Ibis
Medical Redshirt
- Joined
- May 28, 2017
- Messages
- 4,358
Crazy as it sounds, in addition to Campbell, Gainer is starting at UNC and Clark is expected to start at SMU.I saw this too. Campbell is expected to start for Tenn.
Crazy as it sounds, in addition to Campbell, Gainer is starting at UNC and Clark is expected to start at SMU.I saw this too. Campbell is expected to start for Tenn.
Crazy as it sounds, in addition to Campbell, Gainer is starting at UNC and Clark is expected to start at SMU.
Gaynor is about to begin his 7th season. Sheesh.Crazy as it sounds, in addition to Campbell, Gainer is starting at UNC and Clark is expected to start at SMU.
I'd like to have Campbell for depth, but not losing sleep over any of them. Gaynor is competent, but nothing more. Clark is not a P5 starter level player. Below average ACC lineman.Crazy as it sounds, in addition to Campbell, Gainer is starting at UNC and Clark is expected to start at SMU.
Crazy as it sounds, in addition to Campbell, Gainer is starting at UNC and Clark is expected to start at SMU.
Can we make an exception to "Once a Cane, Always a Cane" rule--just this once? Gainor is as corny as his coach.One my top 10 LEAST favorite Canes.
And that’s saying something.
Agree on Gaynor and Clark since both are centers and Lee is much better.The Campbell news is surprising. I mean, even the biggest John Cambell fans wouldn't have called him a SEC OT.
I wish Cambell, Gaynor, and Clark the best but I still don't think they start here.
Agree on Gaynor and Clark since both are centers and Lee is much better.
Cambell? Disagree. He would likely start at LT and allow us to move Rivers to RG. At a minimum, he is quality depth. There’s a reason Rivers has exclusively played on the interior until this year. He’s better suited at guard but is being forced to play on the outside because the frosh aren’t ready and we have nobody else.
Agree on Gaynor and Clark since both are centers and Lee is much better.
Cambell? Disagree. He would likely start at LT and allow us to move Rivers to RG. At a minimum, he is quality depth. There’s a reason Rivers has exclusively played on the interior until this year. He’s better suited at guard but is being forced to play on the outside because the frosh aren’t ready and we have nobody else.
I still have nightmares of watching him snap the ball to KingOne my top 10 LEAST favorite Canes.
And that’s saying something.
What praise? That he will be missed more than Gaynor and Clark? That he would probably start at LT ahead of Rivers? You don’t think its reasonably possible that Cambell would indeed start at LT and Rivers would return to his natural position?Campbell has done absolutely nothing to merit that praise. No way would he start over Rivers, and I’m the one who thinks Rivers should move inside because his feet aren’t quick enough for tackle. Campbell’s feet are molasses. Pate and UTn are deluded. He will disappoint.
He left Miami so now I must HATE HIM
He may be unfairly swept up in such a Bayesian application of hate, but it's better to be safe than sorry!He left Miami so now I must HATE HIM
Save the hate for him for when you hear we didn’t have depth on the OL
What praise? That he will be missed more than Gaynor and Clark? That he would probably start at LT ahead of Rivers? You don’t think its reasonably possible that Cambell would indeed start at LT and Rivers would return to his natural position?
I’m not saying he’s McKinnie but he would have given us a swing tackle without having to play RIvers out of position or possibly rush Samson before he’s ready (hopefully he will be ready).
He left Miami so now I must HATE HIM