forums

Jarren Williams Into The Portal

Advertisement
gabedm said:
Youre aware he didnt, at quite a few times. I agree he shouldnt have played him, but what do you do if your best player is a **** up, like JT4. Literally same issue... You want to win right? I can see the justification if no one else unseated him.
Click to expand...

you play them and promote a cultural issue that could linger for years or you set the tone of your new team in your new role and stand by it.

manny showed weakness and his players exploited it.
 
:cool:
lfit.webp
 
Go Canes!! said:
Interesting article:
Click to expand...


Excellent article. He was very good at times, and he was very bad at times. But I thought that, overall, he played pretty well for being a freshman, in a poor scheme, with not much help at WR or OL.

If he can grow up a little bit and get into the right system, he will be a very good college QB. He’s got the arm talent to do so.
 
Advertisement
Well, whatever issues Williams may have had, the info below from the article is definitely an indictment on the way our receivers played.

"Of those 106, Williams' completion rate of 61.2 percent ranked below the middle of the pack at 61st. Completion percentage isn't always the best indicator of a QB's accuracy, however, but thankfully SIS also has a stat called on-target rate. It's exactly what it sounds like -- as it describes the percentage of a quarterback's throws that were on-target and catchable.

Williams had an on-target rate of 77.2 percent in 2019. On its own, that tied for 18th (along with Eastern Michigan's Mike Glass) among those 106 QBs. But more importantly than the number itself, or where Williams ranked, is the difference between his on-target rate and his completion rate. Williams' on-target rate was a full 16 percent better than his completion rate. Of the 106 FBS QBs with at least 200 pass attempts last season, only one had a more considerable disparity between their completion percentage and on-target rate."

and...

"Well, Miami's receivers couldn't catch, is the simplest way to put it. Of the 130 FBS teams, Miami's receiving corps ranked 117th nationally in on-target catch rate (number of catchable balls receivers catch) at 80.2 percent. Only seven Power Five schools had a lower rate, with Michigan coming in 129th nationally at 75.2 percent "
 
dk72 said:
Well, whatever issues Williams may have had, the info below from the article is definitely an indictment on the way our receivers played.

"Of those 106, Williams' completion rate of 61.2 percent ranked below the middle of the pack at 61st. Completion percentage isn't always the best indicator of a QB's accuracy, however, but thankfully SIS also has a stat called on-target rate. It's exactly what it sounds like -- as it describes the percentage of a quarterback's throws that were on-target and catchable.

Williams had an on-target rate of 77.2 percent in 2019. On its own, that tied for 18th (along with Eastern Michigan's Mike Glass) among those 106 QBs. But more importantly than the number itself, or where Williams ranked, is the difference between his on-target rate and his completion rate. Williams' on-target rate was a full 16 percent better than his completion rate. Of the 106 FBS QBs with at least 200 pass attempts last season, only one had a more considerable disparity between their completion percentage and on-target rate."

and...

"Well, Miami's receivers couldn't catch, is the simplest way to put it. Of the 130 FBS teams, Miami's receiving corps ranked 117th nationally in on-target catch rate (number of catchable balls receivers catch) at 80.2 percent. Only seven Power Five schools had a lower rate, with Michigan coming in 129th nationally at 75.2 percent "
Click to expand...


God ****, Stubbs was a disaster of a hire. Goofy AF and the ONE thing his room was supposed to do was catch the ball. Good riddance
 
jmccomber5 said:
God ****, Stubbs was a disaster of a hire. Goofy AF and the ONE thing his room was supposed to do was catch the ball. Good riddance
Click to expand...
I had mentioned a day or two ago in some posts about Wiggins how disappointing their play was. Wiggins, and really all of the receivers who got significant playing time, play so passively. They don't attack the ball, they don't fight to position their bodies properly. Half the time it seems they politely sit back and allow the DB to make a play on the ball. While our QBs collectively definitely had their issues, our WRs made the problem FAR worse.
 
Advertisement
dk72 said:
I had mentioned a day or two ago in some posts about Wiggins how disappointing their play was. Wiggins, and really all of the receivers who got significant playing time, play so passively. They don't attack the ball, they don't fight to position their bodies properly. Half the time it seems they politely sit back and allow the DB to make a play on the ball. While our QBs collectively definitely had their issues, our WRs made the problem FAR worse.
Click to expand...
That’s why I’m hoping Pope and Payton step up big time. We have been seeing Wiggins and Harley dropping passes for the last 2 years even if they did a little better this season. Even with pope limited playing time last season he caught the ball pretty clean imo
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top