- Joined
- Nov 17, 2011
- Messages
- 12,891
I was hoping that he had experience and given how ****** our room was would be able to start at nickel or at least play heavy minutes.Smh I never saw the Roberts intrigue.
I was hoping that he had experience and given how ****** our room was would be able to start at nickel or at least play heavy minutes.Smh I never saw the Roberts intrigue.
Not according to Gaby
Me too bud but I just didn't see it.I was hoping that he had experience and given how ****** our room was would be able to start at nickel or at least play heavy minutes.
DP Jr is as wellDavonte Brown is the only P5 starter level player for '23. That's why it's a fire.
It didn’t work out at OU doesn’t mean it won’t work here..we are a twisted ankle away from seeing Malik Curtis..no disrespect whatsoever to Malik..but we need to kick the tires on this cat if it comes to itWe need warm bodies, but preferrably they'd be starter quality. Davis stinks.
When you put it that way...It didn’t work out at OU doesn’t mean it won’t work here..we are a twisted ankle away from seeing Malik Curtis..no disrespect whatsoever to Malik..but we need to kick the tires on this cat if it comes to it
I'd like to believe, he's a good dude. Dad played for BC against us in 96.DP Jr is as well
Gotta have optimism for the Heritage boys lolI'd like to believe, he's a good dude. Dad played for BC against us in 96.
I think many on here would disagree with that statement.His lack of production over 4 years at Okla is concerning.
Billy Bowman as a Sophomore basically took his spot.
Between DP Jr, Couch, Terry Roberts & Stafford coming in, I’m not sure what Davis adds to the secondary at Nickel that he would be worth the take. He’s not that much of a significant improvement & considering there are better players at that same spot who are in the Portal & still entering the Portal it’s a bit of an interesting assessment on their part.
The staff certainly knows better than I do, but bringing in a mildly productive underperformer would be a weird take, especially considering he’s only a 1-year rental. But hey, we’ll see.
I doubt he’ll scare many dudes off. Especially if the player is a dude.Double Edged Sword...take too long and someone like DVD comes in and benefits due to the kid wanting to come home. But we move too fast, better options may want in and we might not have a spot.
I mean he can't be any worse than Lou Cristobal right lol
And I think that’s exactly what Mario and Guidry are thinking here.I wonder if this a bodies/low hanging fruit situation. We need depth in the worst way. Local guy probably won’t take a ton of resources to land him. Hopefully he’s not the only answer but if we add 3-4 DBs bringing in a guy with P5 experience makes sense.
If he's our #2 CB in the spring portal, solid.I mentioned this yesterday and again earlier today . It’ll be Miami.
I was thinking more about the 85 roster slots. But D$ said spots aren't an issue. Combined with Cribby saying that this is a Cane lock. I'm good with it because if nothing else he adds experienced depth that has played major P5 football. Plus he doesn't take up any counters for 2024 because this is his last year.I doubt he’ll scare many dudes off. Especially if the player is a dude.
I understand the argument that if player x can provide quality depth at a certain position then the addition improves your team. That is theoretically true. However, that should not be the primary objective of portal additions. We should be targeting players that become starters so the incumbent becomes the backup. That’s how you make noticeable and accelerated improvement to your roster.
Understood. I didn’t say it would be easy. I said it should be the primary objective. I’m not against adding quality depth, but that doesn’t significantly improve your team.The portal isn’t high school.
The talent pool is limited. There are only going to be a few of those types of players.