Since you weren't able to tell me where the 3 was coming from, I had to go it alone:
24 2017 Signings,....The 1st 10 enrolled early and did not count as I.C.'s (which was fun,but this is an OLD rule from the 2016 Handbook, that we cant benefit from next December),...the remaining 14 hard counted against the 25..
1. Dykstra 11.
2. Zalontae Hillery 12.
3. Derrick Smith 13.
4. Zach Feagles 14.
5. Corey Gaynor 15.
6. Jon Ford 16.
7. De'Andre Wilder 17.
8. Mike Harley 18.
9. Jhavonte Dean 19.
10. Trajan Bandy 20.
11. Kai-Leon Herbert 21.
12.N'Kosi Perry 22.
13. Jeff Thomas 23.
14. D.J. Johnson 24.
which left 11,...NOT 3.
We reportedly again brought in 10 EEs,...Which left 1 spot open that was going to be a wasted scholie and roster spot,...and one they obviously did not want to blow 5 years on with someone that was not worthy.
So guess who they decided to give it to?? This kid,...which makes 11 and DOES NOT COUNT against February's 25.
He only counted against the one spot that was set to expire come Jan 24th (per UM's calendar) anyway.
From my vantage point, the 85 is the concern come February if talent comes pouring in, NOT the 25. That 85 # along with common sense are what will limit us. We can get who we want in February,...as well as later,...and this kid has no effect whatsoever. He's a kid that was simply lucky enough to find out we had a spot open that we didnt want to use or waste.
Since the 25 is not a concern we can again back-count next December.
The realization of what's going on also explains why someone like Saban whines so much about the earlier starts kids are getting with EEs and an early signing period. Saban plucked 7 EEs last year,...5 this year. He's getting the best of the best,...though not necessarily kids bright enough to qualify early
He says he has the kids in mind,...but the truth is, schools like Miami having the ability to get twice as many in early on a yearly basis does nothing to serve his own interests.
I've really retired from the day-to-day regarding recruiting,...but on a #'s basis....Richt and Co. could not have managed this expiring rule where midyear enrollees dont handicap your 25 (they do now) any better.