Consigliere
All-American
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 21,927
This is why it's hard to respect a Boise State and in this case Louisville. They both know that their conference schedule is weak and refuse to play a tough OOC to help their strength of schedule. They are more fond of taking the easy way and hoping that other teams who actually play real opponents knock each other out and then Louisville/Boise can back their way into the BCS or BCS Title. If they don't, then they are the first to point the finger "we are 12-0 and should be in over a 1 loss power conference school". It is a joke
Louisville tried to schedule teams, one being Alabama but they preferred VA tech. Louisville has tried, how hard they tried with their AD is unknown to us all with effort placed. Also conference realignment did not help. I'm not defending them, just stating some facts. Do I believe they should get the big game if undefeated? **** no, the sugar bowl? Sure.
The acc has hard far worst teams go to the orange bowl due to acc affiliation so we can't complain.
Trying and failing is not the same as scheduling and playing. The effort to schedule is irrelevant in the rankings.
The facts of realignment don't help either. It just sucks for them when they make their case. The idea that your conference has changed dramatically (i.e. lower quality conference teams) doesn't help your argument in bolstering your case that you should be in the NC.
So when they only beat 0-5 Temple by 23, 1-4 Kentucky by 14 and now 4-2 Rutgers by 14, this is what should ACTUALLY be held in consideration and not the fact that they can't find a quality opponent. Here is another fun fact, in the 3 games above the losing team turned it over 9 times in total. When you force 4 turnovers against Rutgers and only win by 14...that is not convincing IMO.
Last edited: