- Joined
- Jan 16, 2012
- Messages
- 19,988
So because we were in the SEC we would be good? RANDY SHANNON RING A BELL?
DAMNIT MANE
DAMNIT MANE
crossover22[]_[];1501129 said:So because we were in the SEC we would be good? RANDY SHANNON RING A BELL?
DAMNIT MANE
You people are delusional, UM could not afford the arms race of the sec and we would be a mid major like Vandy. Remember UM is a small private school where would the massive amounts of money come from. Even in UM's hay day the atheletic dept reveneue was not off the charts hence the move to the ACC, which caused the football team their dominance becuase the overall competition level increasesd.
Yes UM will be dominant again but to say we couod run a gauntlet like the sec every year no chance now winning 3 or 4 huge games a year UM can handle that no problem. Hence why UM turned down the chance to play LSU in the 2014 season opener where we would have a new QB and New oline.
But again when the scheduling is managed well UM can be very successful.
Go Canes
You people are delusional, UM could not afford the arms race of the sec and we would be a mid major like Vandy. Remember UM is a small private school where would the massive amounts of money come from. Even in UM's hay day the atheletic dept reveneue was not off the charts hence the move to the ACC, which caused the football team their dominance becuase the overall competition level increasesd.
Yes UM will be dominant again but to say we couod run a gauntlet like the sec every year no chance now winning 3 or 4 huge games a year UM can handle that no problem. Hence why UM turned down the chance to play LSU in the 2014 season opener where we would have a new QB and New oline.
But again when the scheduling is managed well UM can be very successful.
Go Canes
You people are delusional, UM could not afford the arms race of the sec and we would be a mid major like Vandy. Remember UM is a small private school where would the massive amounts of money come from. Even in UM's hay day the atheletic dept reveneue was not off the charts hence the move to the ACC, which caused the football team their dominance becuase the overall competition level increasesd.
Yes UM will be dominant again but to say we couod run a gauntlet like the sec every year no chance now winning 3 or 4 huge games a year UM can handle that no problem. Hence why UM turned down the chance to play LSU in the 2014 season opener where we would have a new QB and New oline.
But again when the scheduling is managed well UM can be very successful.
Go Canes
How can anyone take you serious when you say moving to the ACC cost Miami their dominance?
2 incompetent coaches cost Miami their dominance.
And also say Miami will have a new line in 2014. We will return 4 out of our top 6, Flowers, Bunche, McDermott, Feliciano