You can't compare schedules to gauge these two teams. The only two things too compare are coaching and trenches. Oregon would be a 3 to four loss team in the acc or sec. Mainly because the west coast doesn't see the type of trench play you see on the east. That's why Oregon has a bad record vs sec teams. That offense looks high powered against all those west coast teams with no tank carradines, Olivier Vernon, and Easley. Again, nick fairly single handed ly dominated that Oregon team and auburna d that year was no better than fuss this year. Fsu hasn't lost a game in forever and they are the most recent champion, bigger target on their head than any team and they STILL win. Oregons coaching staff isn't proven and neither are their trench lineman.
Fsu has faced tougher trench teams than Oregon has and fsu will wear Oregon down in the trenches. They're just too loaded for a west coast team.
Mark herflinch will have to call the game of his life to beat fsu.
It's all about the trenches and play calling. When you can show me where Oregon has any advantage and why then I may put money on Oregon. But saying "their offense is high powered" is not cutting it. Oregon offense been high powered for 10 years.... What they have to show for it?
I'll wit...l
LOL...this guy said Oregon would be a 3-4 loss team in the ACC. Please don't offer your opinion anymore.
You asked what does Oregon have to show for it after 10 years? How about 7 BCS bowl appearances
The only teams Oregon has loss to were
Auburn - national champs
LSU - played in title game
Stanford- Rose bow winners
Arizona - Pac 12 runner up
So are you telling me that is not something to show for?