Herd wants Miami to be good

I think Cowherd may have been talking about Miami Soccer. That's all he seems to really care about aside from Yasiel Puig and pretending he can relate to people in their 20's. Oh and slobbering over Lebron's letter.

Everytime I turn his show on, hes talking about Puig. It's odd.
 
Advertisement
Dammit mane... Everybody wants the U to be good, but Donna and golden..

Yes, of course you're right. Their goal is to make Miami football suck. That's what every head coach and University President strive for. Glad we've got Mensa member BigDikCane here to let us know about this.

Not to mention BigDikCane made fun of Jim Kelly's cancer. I hope people haven't forgotten about that.

I did. But then again, you bring it up every five minutes.

Make a thread, announce it, and maybe be done with it. They'll probably address the matter in Bigdik's monthly Mensa meeting. He's the regional vice president, I think.

I don't bring it up every five minutes, just when I notice a post by BigDikCane. I'll continue with my current posting policy on this matter as creating single thread would certainly do a great disservice in highlighting BigDikCane's statement regarding a beloved Miami Hurricane. I'll be sure and attend said Mensa meeting as well.
 
Just said that ESPN really wants USC, Michigan and Miami to be good for ratings. Says small market teams being good isn't good for his show or the company. Called Miami "flashy, flamboyant and controversial, all things that sell"


That can't be true. According to posters on here, ESPN hates UM.

Just because ESPN wants UM to be good so that they can call our players code words like thugs, talk about past "controversy," and then make a big deal about us losing a game doesn't mean ESPN doesn't hate us.

Some of the **** that ESPN personalities said about Sean Taylor was so disgusting that it has been 7 years since I have watched sportscenter. I only turn on that joke of a channel to watch live sports.
 
Just said that ESPN really wants USC, Michigan and Miami to be good for ratings. Says small market teams being good isn't good for his show or the company. Called Miami "flashy, flamboyant and controversial, all things that sell"


That can't be true. According to posters on here, ESPN hates UM.

Just because ESPN wants UM to be good so that they can call our players code words like thugs, talk about past "controversy," and then make a big deal about us losing a game doesn't mean ESPN doesn't hate us.

Some of the **** that ESPN personalities said about Sean Taylor was so disgusting that it has been 7 years since I have watched sportscenter. I only turn on that joke of a channel to watch live sports.

If you haven't watched anything other than live sports then how do you know what ESPN says about our players? If anything, the ESPN Gameday crew continues to blow sunshine about UM year after year, though that finally began to dissipate in the last couple of seasons.

I've never heard Fowler, Herbstreit, et al., call UM players thugs. Whether we like it or not, the Shapiro mess was news in the CFB world, so of course it was discussed, on ESPN and every other CFB program. That doesn't mean the reporters hate UM.

and what does "make a big deal about [UM] losing a game" even mean? explain how they treat our losses any differently than other losses.
 
Last edited:
Just said that ESPN really wants USC, Michigan and Miami to be good for ratings. Says small market teams being good isn't good for his show or the company. Called Miami "flashy, flamboyant and controversial, all things that sell"


That can't be true. According to posters on here, ESPN hates UM.

Just because ESPN wants UM to be good so that they can call our players code words like thugs, talk about past "controversy," and then make a big deal about us losing a game doesn't mean ESPN doesn't hate us.

Some of the **** that ESPN personalities said about Sean Taylor was so disgusting that it has been 7 years since I have watched sportscenter. I only turn on that joke of a channel to watch live sports.
I will never forget how they vilified us for that FIU fight and blamed us for starting it. Anthony Reddick swinging his helmet and Brandon Merriweather stomping on someone was shown over and over. But no mention of Marshall Mcduffie stomping out our player or FIU players running in and throwing flying haymakers at our guys that was just standing around.
 
Advertisement
Just said that ESPN really wants USC, Michigan and Miami to be good for ratings. Says small market teams being good isn't good for his show or the company. Called Miami "flashy, flamboyant and controversial, all things that sell"


That can't be true. According to posters on here, ESPN hates UM.

Just because ESPN wants UM to be good so that they can call our players code words like thugs, talk about past "controversy," and then make a big deal about us losing a game doesn't mean ESPN doesn't hate us.

Some of the **** that ESPN personalities said about Sean Taylor was so disgusting that it has been 7 years since I have watched sportscenter. I only turn on that joke of a channel to watch live sports.

If you haven't watched anything other than live sports then how do you know what ESPN says about our players? If anything, the ESPN Gameday crew continues to blow sunshine about UM year after year, though that finally began to dissipate in the last couple of seasons.

I've never heard Fowler, Herbstreit, et all, call UM players thugs. Whether we like it or not, the Shapiro mess was news in the CFB world, so of course it was discussed, on ESPN and every other CFB program. That doesn't mean the reporters hate UM.

and what does "make a big deal about [UM] losing a game" even mean? explain how they treat our losses any differently than other losses.

No idea what you're so angry about. I didn't know that Kirk Herbstreit and Fowler constitute all of ESPN. I know what ESPN personalities used to say about our players, and I doubt it has changed. Sorry you couldn't understand that, but you should have been able to gather it from my post. And no clue why you're talking about Nevin Shapiro, either.

ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose. You really couldn't figure that out?
 
Dammit mane... Everybody wants the U to be good, but Donna and golden..

Yes, of course you're right. Their goal is to make Miami football suck. That's what every head coach and University President strive for. Glad we've got Mensa member BigDikCane here to let us know about this.

Not to mention BigDikCane made fun of Jim Kelly's cancer. I hope people haven't forgotten about that.

I did. But then again, you bring it up every five minutes.

Make a thread, announce it, and maybe be done with it. They'll probably address the matter in Bigdik's monthly Mensa meeting. He's the regional vice president, I think.

I don't bring it up every five minutes, just when I notice a post by BigDikCane. I'll continue with my current posting policy on this matter as creating single thread would certainly do a great disservice in highlighting BigDikCane's statement regarding a beloved Miami Hurricane. I'll be sure and attend said Mensa meeting as well.

why are you always on the board moping..
 
Just said that ESPN really wants USC, Michigan and Miami to be good for ratings. Says small market teams being good isn't good for his show or the company. Called Miami "flashy, flamboyant and controversial, all things that sell"


That can't be true. According to posters on here, ESPN hates UM.

Just because ESPN wants UM to be good so that they can call our players code words like thugs, talk about past "controversy," and then make a big deal about us losing a game doesn't mean ESPN doesn't hate us.

Some of the **** that ESPN personalities said about Sean Taylor was so disgusting that it has been 7 years since I have watched sportscenter. I only turn on that joke of a channel to watch live sports.

If you haven't watched anything other than live sports then how do you know what ESPN says about our players? If anything, the ESPN Gameday crew continues to blow sunshine about UM year after year, though that finally began to dissipate in the last couple of seasons.

I've never heard Fowler, Herbstreit, et all, call UM players thugs. Whether we like it or not, the Shapiro mess was news in the CFB world, so of course it was discussed, on ESPN and every other CFB program. That doesn't mean the reporters hate UM.

and what does "make a big deal about [UM] losing a game" even mean? explain how they treat our losses any differently than other losses.

No idea what you're so angry about. I didn't know that Kirk Herbstreit and Fowler constitute all of ESPN. I know what ESPN personalities used to say about our players, and I doubt it has changed. Sorry you couldn't understand that, but you should have been able to gather it from my post. And no clue why you're talking about Nevin Shapiro, either.

ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose. You really couldn't figure that out?


Not angry at all.

I don't know why our fans persist in the unsupported claim that ESPN and other CFB media hate UM. Other fanbases do the same thing, and it's equally ridiculous.

Not saying that Fowler and Herbstreit are all of ESPN; that's why I added "et al." I was focusing on Gameday, bc that is ESPN's signature CFB show.

I assumed the reference to "controversy" was the Shapiro mess, given that you did not specifically reference anything.

You may have theorized that "ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose[,]" but that doesn't make it so. ESPN talks a lot about the teams that are on top of CFB, when they are on top. They did it with us, USC, UF, and now Alabama and FSU.

If something happens like the Reggie Bush scandal, Jamies Winston allegations and cover-up, Shapiro, etc..., they will talk about that as well. It does not mean they were trying to tear down USC, FSU, or UM. It's CFB news, and people are interested so they report it.
 
That can't be true. According to posters on here, ESPN hates UM.

Just because ESPN wants UM to be good so that they can call our players code words like thugs, talk about past "controversy," and then make a big deal about us losing a game doesn't mean ESPN doesn't hate us.

Some of the **** that ESPN personalities said about Sean Taylor was so disgusting that it has been 7 years since I have watched sportscenter. I only turn on that joke of a channel to watch live sports.

If you haven't watched anything other than live sports then how do you know what ESPN says about our players? If anything, the ESPN Gameday crew continues to blow sunshine about UM year after year, though that finally began to dissipate in the last couple of seasons.

I've never heard Fowler, Herbstreit, et all, call UM players thugs. Whether we like it or not, the Shapiro mess was news in the CFB world, so of course it was discussed, on ESPN and every other CFB program. That doesn't mean the reporters hate UM.

and what does "make a big deal about [UM] losing a game" even mean? explain how they treat our losses any differently than other losses.

No idea what you're so angry about. I didn't know that Kirk Herbstreit and Fowler constitute all of ESPN. I know what ESPN personalities used to say about our players, and I doubt it has changed. Sorry you couldn't understand that, but you should have been able to gather it from my post. And no clue why you're talking about Nevin Shapiro, either.

ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose. You really couldn't figure that out?


Not angry at all.

I don't know why our fans persist in the unsupported claim that ESPN and other CFB media hate UM. Other fanbases do the same thing, and it's equally ridiculous.

Not saying that Fowler and Herbstreit are all of ESPN; that's why I added "et al." I was focusing on Gameday, bc that is ESPN's signature CFB show.

I assumed the reference to "controversy" was the Shapiro mess, given that you did not specifically reference anything.

You may have theorized that "ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose[,]" but that doesn't make it so. ESPN talks a lot about the teams that are on top of CFB, when they are on top. They did it with us, USC, UF, and now Alabama and FSU.

If something happens like the Reggie Bush scandal, Jamies Winston allegations and cover-up, Shapiro, etc..., they will talk about that as well. It does not mean they were trying to tear down USC, FSU, or UM. It's CFB news, and people are interested so they report it.

Your post is just not on point at all. Nobody here accused ESPN of hating UM because they talked about Nevin Shapiro, nor did anybody say that UM was the only team that ESPN liked to build up to tear down. Not really sure what you're whining about.
 
Advertisement
why are you always on the board moping..

I remember someone on this board making fun of Jim Kelly's cancer but I cant recall who it was....

368.gif
 
Just because ESPN wants UM to be good so that they can call our players code words like thugs, talk about past "controversy," and then make a big deal about us losing a game doesn't mean ESPN doesn't hate us.

Some of the **** that ESPN personalities said about Sean Taylor was so disgusting that it has been 7 years since I have watched sportscenter. I only turn on that joke of a channel to watch live sports.

If you haven't watched anything other than live sports then how do you know what ESPN says about our players? If anything, the ESPN Gameday crew continues to blow sunshine about UM year after year, though that finally began to dissipate in the last couple of seasons.

I've never heard Fowler, Herbstreit, et all, call UM players thugs. Whether we like it or not, the Shapiro mess was news in the CFB world, so of course it was discussed, on ESPN and every other CFB program. That doesn't mean the reporters hate UM.

and what does "make a big deal about [UM] losing a game" even mean? explain how they treat our losses any differently than other losses.

No idea what you're so angry about. I didn't know that Kirk Herbstreit and Fowler constitute all of ESPN. I know what ESPN personalities used to say about our players, and I doubt it has changed. Sorry you couldn't understand that, but you should have been able to gather it from my post. And no clue why you're talking about Nevin Shapiro, either.

ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose. You really couldn't figure that out?


Not angry at all.

I don't know why our fans persist in the unsupported claim that ESPN and other CFB media hate UM. Other fanbases do the same thing, and it's equally ridiculous.

Not saying that Fowler and Herbstreit are all of ESPN; that's why I added "et al." I was focusing on Gameday, bc that is ESPN's signature CFB show.

I assumed the reference to "controversy" was the Shapiro mess, given that you did not specifically reference anything.

You may have theorized that "ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose[,]" but that doesn't make it so. ESPN talks a lot about the teams that are on top of CFB, when they are on top. They did it with us, USC, UF, and now Alabama and FSU.

If something happens like the Reggie Bush scandal, Jamies Winston allegations and cover-up, Shapiro, etc..., they will talk about that as well. It does not mean they were trying to tear down USC, FSU, or UM. It's CFB news, and people are interested so they report it.

Your post is just not on point at all. Nobody here accused ESPN of hating UM because they talked about Nevin Shapiro, nor did anybody say that UM was the only team that ESPN liked to build up to tear down. Not really sure what you're whining about.



lol at the "whining" comment.

the problem is you didn't provide examples of all the alleged ESPN hatred of UM.
 
If you haven't watched anything other than live sports then how do you know what ESPN says about our players? If anything, the ESPN Gameday crew continues to blow sunshine about UM year after year, though that finally began to dissipate in the last couple of seasons.

I've never heard Fowler, Herbstreit, et all, call UM players thugs. Whether we like it or not, the Shapiro mess was news in the CFB world, so of course it was discussed, on ESPN and every other CFB program. That doesn't mean the reporters hate UM.

and what does "make a big deal about [UM] losing a game" even mean? explain how they treat our losses any differently than other losses.

No idea what you're so angry about. I didn't know that Kirk Herbstreit and Fowler constitute all of ESPN. I know what ESPN personalities used to say about our players, and I doubt it has changed. Sorry you couldn't understand that, but you should have been able to gather it from my post. And no clue why you're talking about Nevin Shapiro, either.

ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose. You really couldn't figure that out?


Not angry at all.

I don't know why our fans persist in the unsupported claim that ESPN and other CFB media hate UM. Other fanbases do the same thing, and it's equally ridiculous.

Not saying that Fowler and Herbstreit are all of ESPN; that's why I added "et al." I was focusing on Gameday, bc that is ESPN's signature CFB show.

I assumed the reference to "controversy" was the Shapiro mess, given that you did not specifically reference anything.

You may have theorized that "ESPN likes to build teams up so they can tear them down and have a story when they lose[,]" but that doesn't make it so. ESPN talks a lot about the teams that are on top of CFB, when they are on top. They did it with us, USC, UF, and now Alabama and FSU.

If something happens like the Reggie Bush scandal, Jamies Winston allegations and cover-up, Shapiro, etc..., they will talk about that as well. It does not mean they were trying to tear down USC, FSU, or UM. It's CFB news, and people are interested so they report it.

Your post is just not on point at all. Nobody here accused ESPN of hating UM because they talked about Nevin Shapiro, nor did anybody say that UM was the only team that ESPN liked to build up to tear down. Not really sure what you're whining about.



lol at the "whining" comment.

the problem is you didn't provide examples of all the alleged ESPN hatred of UM.

No, that's your problem.
 
Advertisement
Dammit mane... Everybody wants the U to be good, but Donna and golden..

Yes, of course you're right. Their goal is to make Miami football suck. That's what every head coach and University President strive for. Glad we've got Mensa member BigDikCane here to let us know about this.

How good is your memory?

The University of Colorado used to have a pretty good football team in the 80's and 90's. Played in the Orange Bowl a few times, won a national title in '89 or '90 I believe.

Then two things happened. First, allegations came out that they were giving out girls for their recruits. Second, the local well-to-do complained about rowdiness at the stadium.

Next thing that happened is the University of Colorado's female president came out and said how offended she was about trading *** for recruits, and vowed that the University of Colorado would "clean up the program."

Today, the University of Colorado has the 101st ranked recruiting class, and last year's record was 1-11.

Now who does that story remind you of???

Their university president also goes to games in school colors, also says platitudes like "we want to win the right way" and also gives zero ***** about football, just like our own lady president.
 
Just said that ESPN really wants USC, Michigan and Miami to be good for ratings. Says small market teams being good isn't good for his show or the company. Called Miami "flashy, flamboyant and controversial, all things that sell"

I wish we were flashy, flamboyant, controversial again. I think those days ended in 1994.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top