- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 16,732
I've always been partial to Edge.
first of all... this
secondly... to say its one or the other but not even close is absolutely insane. both were elite.
Im ridin with gore.
I've always been partial to Edge.
NFL Stats
McGahee
Attempts: 1,957
Yards: 8,097
YPC: 4.1
TD's: 63
Gore
Attempts: 1,911
Yards: 8,839
YPC: 4.6
TD's: 51
Portis
Attempts: 2,230
Yards: 9,923
YPC: 4.4
TD's: 75
Might not be relevant to the conversation. Just throwin' it out there.
Anyone watch Frank last year?
Yeah, he is STILL one of the best. He's got the best vision of any running back I've ever seen.
He could have been the GOAT. Willis was a beast no doubt, but Gore would have been legendary.
Anyone watch Frank last year?
Yeah, he is STILL one of the best. He's got the best vision of any running back I've ever seen.
He could have been the GOAT. Willis was a beast no doubt, but Gore would have been legendary.
**** shame he blew out both knees, still has arguably the best vision I have ever seen from a RB. Just scary how he sees plays develop.
I think the most clear part of this whole thing is that it absolutely sucks that we have to make clarifications in this discussion. The what ifs here cost us potentially two national titles in 02/03 and 03/04. Not much of a stretch to think that we can win vs. OSU with McGahee, and who knows what a healthy Gore does for this team both of those years.
The answer has to be McGahee because he had one of the best seasons a RB has had nationally over the past 20 years. Other guys may have compiled big yardage numbers, but considering the stage he was doing it on it's hard to throw many against him. I'm not as old as some, but at 26 I can pretty confidently say that he, Adrian Peterson, and Reggie Bush were the three best college RBs I've personally ever seen.
Now, Frank Gore is obviously a special case because of what happened to him with injuries, though he likely would have been the better because he'd have been the guy over McGahee. As an earlier poster said, he was just a natural talent at the position, which is absolutely proven by the way he plays the position today. If a young player wants to know how to play running back, they need to watch him. Vision, quickness, power, he's everything a RB needs to be, scary that most of it would be a few notches above if the knees were healthy.
Gotta go Gore here for the same reasons of him jumping McGahee on the depth chart when they were both healthy. That and Gore made runs that were just unreal.
2001 Stats:
McGahee
Attempts: 67
Yards: 314
YPC: 4.7
TD's: 3
Gore
Attempts: 62
Yards: 562
YPC: 9.1
TD's: 5
Gore comes in a year after McGahee, jumps him in the depth chart, and almost doubles McGahee's ypc.
Gore's game vs. West Virginia when he had 6 atts - 124 yds - 2 td's ....was unbelievable. Watch the runs at 8:00, 8:40, and 9:38.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_9TAj29XNY[/QUO
wow.....didn't realize that mcgahee that more attempts than gore that year lol....I just remember him plying in the rose bowl and he had a td fsu. ****....my argument for mcgahee is starting to really dwindle.
If we put Gore in the 03 Fiesta Bowl, * would not have won that day. I am 100% convinced of that.
NFL Stats
McGahee
Attempts: 1,957
Yards: 8,097
YPC: 4.1
TD's: 63
Gore
Attempts: 1,911
Yards: 8,839
YPC: 4.6
TD's: 51
Portis
Attempts: 2,230
Yards: 9,923
YPC: 4.4
TD's: 75
Might not be relevant to the conversation. Just throwin' it out there.