I said we'd be below 85 in another thread, but wow @ 80.Says we will probably have at most 80 scholarship players this year.
any chance that that we'll call that a self-imposed limit designed to blunt NCAA sanctions?
I said we'd be below 85 in another thread, but wow @ 80.Says we will probably have at most 80 scholarship players this year.
[video=youtube;L8rX5CMWHHk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8rX5CMWHHk&feature=plcp&context=C3d651e4U DOEgsToPDskLL_Nqdd_rKzrS-EbV6ELB-[/video]
[video=youtube;1CoDq6Mj8Jw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CoDq6Mj8Jw&context=C37ea500ADOEgsToPDskIN COT_dcirQO7CSNebM94t[/video]
Don't believe it works that way.I said we'd be below 85 in another thread, but wow @ 80.Says we will probably have at most 80 scholarship players this year.
any chance that that we'll call that a self-imposed limit designed to blunt NCAA sanctions?
Apparently you guys are missing rokulika's sarcasm. Earlier in the day, someone was ****ed that we missed on "". Was a running joke for most of the day.
You newbies need to lighten up and quit jumping on people's ***. Most of the posters around here are very sarcastic... Roll with it.