- Joined
- Feb 3, 2018
- Messages
- 13,020
I’m no mafia expert but I don’t think that would get you “made”
**** so havenocock didnt want to pay up, pause
Here’s footage of the moment Rashada told himbruh.... could yall imagine Kirby's face when Rashada and his attorney first told him they wanted to sue UF?
Holy shiiiiit lets go AI content got to get started tonight lolTried to tell people that the SEC has been setting up these "parental job offers" for years...
View attachment 290087
in that time period was the UM collective concurrently up and running alongside lifewallet or just getting things together?
lol I may be mistaken because I cant see the tweets but I think @TrumpyCane was pulling receipts from Rojas from when the Rashada **** went down in 2022/2023.Eddie Rojas is a complete dip****.
Those "quotes" came from a legal filing in federal court.
Miami did not get "smacked" by the NCAA.
And the case against Florida was put on hold due to the Tennessee lawsuit. Florida was not exonerated. Eddie Rojas was not exonerated.
******* ****bag little liar. "If I'm so guilty, why am I not in jail" type attitude. **** you, Eddie Rojas.
Forgive my ignorance here... is it even a "verbal" agreement if it's a text message? Seems like it would be considered written and binding under that statuteThis might be Northern's most humiliating post ever.
He is wrong on every single element, particularly consideration.
Someone needs to refresh Northern's recollection on what constitutes valid consideration. One type is "refraining to do something that you otherwise had the legal right to do". Such as, you know, enrolling at a non-Florida school when you were promised to be paid $1M for enrolling at UF.
Northern also needs to look up "detrimental reliance".
View attachment 290094
So, I have an extremely dumb question, so go easy on me.
In D$'s video about this, he mentioned Hathcock the UF Booster.
If a booster is giving millions and millions to NIL collectives, does the booster make money in return from the program?
Yup they’re wrong, including Counselor Beeker. It only gets tossed by a biased UiF judge. It sure seems like they induced Rashada to break a contract for the promise of more money.
So, then boosters just give millions and millions without making anything in return from the university?Not really.
I guess you COULD if you were doing some kind of business with a university, but Hathnocock owns an automotive business that I do not believe does business with UiF.
He is a booster ... a UF alum who is fairly wealthy and financially supports the UF football program. He was reportedly THE primary financial backer of UF NIL for football. They have another group that supports basketball etc. His NIL contributions are donations, not investments with a financial return, outside of doing something like his original proposal which included some autograph signing. Hathcock was ****ed that "Miami and Ruiz" were beating Napier in the recruiting battles ... and he called up a sports agent and gave him instructions to "negotiate a deal to flip Rashada from Miami". The agent told Hathcock that it would take $13.8 Million, that was the negotiated figure. Kid flipped, signed the LOI, and then Hathcock told the Gator Collective that he was backing out. Gator Collective told Rashada, and Rashada had to go to the NCAA to get a waiver from his LOI. Gator Collective was shut down and replaced by another "collective". UF screwed Rashada out of the NIL he would have received from Miami.So, I have an extremely dumb question, so go easy on me.
In D$'s video about this, he mentioned Hathcock the UF Booster.
If a booster is giving millions and millions to NIL collectives, does the booster make money in return from the program?
A hearty thank you.So, then boosters just give millions and millions without making anything in return from the university?
Forgive my ignorance here... is it even a "verbal" agreement if it's a text message?
Yup they’re wrong, including Counselor Beeker. It only gets tossed by a biased UiF judge. It sure seems like they induced Rashada to break a contract for the promise of more money.