- Joined
- Jan 12, 2014
- Messages
- 55,515
That's exactly what I'm saying!
.I am not a Gaytor fan, I am a Miami Hurricanes fan and I was just supporting my friends. I made a mistake and I'm sorry for what I did.
Hey, I know this is a bit off topic, but I heard a rumor that McChoppers had a hot date last weekend...
View attachment 50491
No chance. They kicked out Cam Newton for a stolen laptop when he wasn't even arrested yet. Even if they get diversion, the felony case remains open until the conditions are complete. Can't imagine the scrutiny they would receive playing them with open felonies. And to top it off they used the school issued id and bought items from the school bookstore. Don't understand how they are still students.
Thanks. I don't know crim law but what you are saying makes sense. How can they play with open felonies???
Why not? These aren't as yet NCAA violations, so will the NCAA get involved? And if they don't, is there anything to say that uf can't play these criminals? Sure it looks bad, but who's going to actually force uf to release them?
Here's the deal. When players take monetary benefits, it puts their ELIGIBILITY in question; they are no longer AMATEURS. Even if NCAA violations have not yet been filed, you (the University) have to go to the NCAA to show that the problem has been caught, fixed, and that the player(s) show(s) remorse, and then the NCAA decides to "reinstate" the amateurism of the player(s).
Go back and look at what has happened to UM previously. The University "gets out ahead of the problem" by suspending the player and reporting it to the NCAA. The player pays back the benefits and writes an apology letter. The University submits the package to the NCAA and eventually the player is allowed to play again. In most cases...assuming the player doesn't lie and/or deny.
I was thinking of this as a crime VS. football issue, but I see what you're saying about them having gained financially. So is the only issue from an NCAA standpoint that they gained financially? Like if they'd killed some people* and uf didn't mind having them on the team, would the NCAA object?
*this is of course a completely theoretical situation not meant to imply that uf players have or would ever commit murder††
††uf players are murderers
Thanks. I don't know crim law but what you are saying makes sense. How can they play with open felonies???
Why not? These aren't as yet NCAA violations, so will the NCAA get involved? And if they don't, is there anything to say that uf can't play these criminals? Sure it looks bad, but who's going to actually force uf to release them?
Here's the deal. When players take monetary benefits, it puts their ELIGIBILITY in question; they are no longer AMATEURS. Even if NCAA violations have not yet been filed, you (the University) have to go to the NCAA to show that the problem has been caught, fixed, and that the player(s) show(s) remorse, and then the NCAA decides to "reinstate" the amateurism of the player(s).
Go back and look at what has happened to UM previously. The University "gets out ahead of the problem" by suspending the player and reporting it to the NCAA. The player pays back the benefits and writes an apology letter. The University submits the package to the NCAA and eventually the player is allowed to play again. In most cases...assuming the player doesn't lie and/or deny.
I was thinking of this as a crime VS. football issue, but I see what you're saying about them having gained financially. So is the only issue from an NCAA standpoint that they gained financially? Like if they'd killed some people* and uf didn't mind having them on the team, would the NCAA object?
*this is of course a completely theoretical situation not meant to imply that uf players have or would ever commit murder††
††uf players are murderers
All I was trying to say is that there are two separate issues. If Gaytors are charged with crimes, then I believe there is a Florida state rule that says active felony charges will prevent a player from taking the field.
Of course, there is a separate issue for NCAA eligibility. Meaning...even if the players paid back all the money and ol' Huntley cuts them a deal, they would still have to clear the NCAA hurdle.
Lots of Gaytors try to snow us by acting like "once the criminal issues are resolved, all the players will be back".
Not so fast...
Thanks. I don't know crim law but what you are saying makes sense. How can they play with open felonies???
Why not? These aren't as yet NCAA violations, so will the NCAA get involved? And if they don't, is there anything to say that uf can't play these criminals? Sure it looks bad, but who's going to actually force uf to release them?
Here's the deal. When players take monetary benefits, it puts their ELIGIBILITY in question; they are no longer AMATEURS. Even if NCAA violations have not yet been filed, you (the University) have to go to the NCAA to show that the problem has been caught, fixed, and that the player(s) show(s) remorse, and then the NCAA decides to "reinstate" the amateurism of the player(s).
Go back and look at what has happened to UM previously. The University "gets out ahead of the problem" by suspending the player and reporting it to the NCAA. The player pays back the benefits and writes an apology letter. The University submits the package to the NCAA and eventually the player is allowed to play again. In most cases...assuming the player doesn't lie and/or deny.
I was thinking of this as a crime VS. football issue, but I see what you're saying about them having gained financially. So is the only issue from an NCAA standpoint that they gained financially? Like if they'd killed some people* and uf didn't mind having them on the team, would the NCAA object?
*this is of course a completely theoretical situation not meant to imply that uf players have or would ever commit murder††
††uf players are murderers
All I was trying to say is that there are two separate issues. If Gaytors are charged with crimes, then I believe there is a Florida state rule that says active felony charges will prevent a player from taking the field.
Of course, there is a separate issue for NCAA eligibility. Meaning...even if the players paid back all the money and ol' Huntley cuts them a deal, they would still have to clear the NCAA hurdle.
Lots of Gaytors try to snow us by acting like "once the criminal issues are resolved, all the players will be back".
Not so fast...
[TWEET]913069084681543680[/TWEET]
[TWEET]913069084681543680[/TWEET]
I was just about to ask someone to post this one score games list. The local gata writers are trying to put out as many fluff pieces they can to make the program look like it's still relevant. Look at the teams in those 1 score games hahahhaa.
[TWEET]913069084681543680[/TWEET]
I was just about to ask someone to post this one score games list. The local gata writers are trying to put out as many fluff pieces they can to make the program look like it's still relevant. Look at the teams in those 1 score games hahahhaa.
It was also a one score game vs Georigia Southern..... ��
Hypocrites...
View attachment 50518
View attachment 50519
View attachment 50520
View attachment 50522
View attachment 50521
View attachment 50523
Nice group of criminals at UiF.
Hypocrites...
View attachment 50518
View attachment 50519
View attachment 50520
View attachment 50522
View attachment 50521
View attachment 50523
Nice group of criminals at UiF.
Hypocrites...
View attachment 50518
View attachment 50519
View attachment 50520
View attachment 50522
View attachment 50521
View attachment 50523
Nice group of criminals at UiF.
Grape are getting sour
Hey, I know this is a bit off topic, but I heard a rumor that McChoppers had a hot date last weekend...
View attachment 50491