UMFarArcher
All-ACC
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Messages
- 16,864
I can't believe that NIL is being blamed for some teams getting top players.
The larger teams in the SEC, and a team or two from other conferences have been buying players for over 50 years. Alabama, Auburn, Georgia, Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Nebraska, USC, UCLA, - and others in sporadic outbursts.
What's ****ing everyone off - it's NOW legal, and some teams - ATM, UM, and a few others are now in the game - and it's diluting those with decades-long elaborate player payments/cars/ and some even providing families house payments and jobs! Many just ways to conceal the buying and make it harder to detect.
So when ATM went full bore - when UM early on jumped on this new rule change - it ****es off everyone who can't compete financially - and it ****es off those with elaborate - but now obsolete systems for buying players.
And of course, we're all confident that UF never - EVER - had someone pay a player to come to UF . . .
The larger teams in the SEC, and a team or two from other conferences have been buying players for over 50 years. Alabama, Auburn, Georgia, Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Nebraska, USC, UCLA, - and others in sporadic outbursts.
What's ****ing everyone off - it's NOW legal, and some teams - ATM, UM, and a few others are now in the game - and it's diluting those with decades-long elaborate player payments/cars/ and some even providing families house payments and jobs! Many just ways to conceal the buying and make it harder to detect.
So when ATM went full bore - when UM early on jumped on this new rule change - it ****es off everyone who can't compete financially - and it ****es off those with elaborate - but now obsolete systems for buying players.
And of course, we're all confident that UF never - EVER - had someone pay a player to come to UF . . .