Man, please stop. Who said "he's the luckiest guy ever"?
But is it wrong to say he was elevated to OC at Clemson with no real national search, no real competition, and very little resume to that point? Is that wrong, or just factual?
Yes, Billy got LUCKY that Dabo was hired as an interim and had no juice to go out and hire the kind of coaching staff that Mario just did. That's called being in the right place at the right time, IS IT NOT? And, again, if Billy had gone on to have an amazing career at Clemson, you start to forget about how he got the job in the first place. BUT HE WAS FIRED AFTER TWO YEARS.
As for his tenure at Alabama, yes, he got LUCKY to be taken on by Saban. Why? Because he did not really have the resume to merit the job he was given. Mario was a FORMER HEAD COACH, he took his team to bowls. Billy hung out in South Carolina schools for 8 years, finally getting a lucky break at Clemson and turning it into a firing 2 years later. To act as if that merited a job at Alabama ignores the obvious, that Dabo (out of guilt?) arranged a cushy landing spot for his 5-year buddy. Again, if you think I'm wrong, tell me what Billy did to DESERVE a spot in Saban's Rehab Clinic.
Tell me how I've "discredited the work that Billy has done". What amazing work has he done? He has a habit of claiming credit for recruits he didn't recruit. He's not known as a good game day coach. He doesn't have some revolutionary playbook a la Dennis Erickson. I seem to keep hearing that Billy is hella organized and super thorough, which are great skills for a file clerk. I have said nothing about his time at Louisiana, he did a bang-up job for 4 years at a G5 school.
So tell me where I said anything "untrue" about Billy Napier. I'd love to hear this.
All you have done is to state the obvious about how the coaching fraternity contines to recycle itself into new jobs after multiple prior failures. And? That justifies a huge contract at a top SEC school, a $40 million buyout, and unprecedented salary structure for assistants and staff?
Billy Napier may yet succeed at Florida, but there is nothing wrong with pointing out his thin resume, lack of tangible accomplishments to which HE should be credited, and the false myth of him being a great recruiter.