forums

FSU offered Kerr today

Advertisement
higabe said:
I'm not gonna lose any sleep over this kid...I mean I like Kerr...it's just that I'm comfortable with dobard and Johnson, I just hope he doesn't flip and then end up balling out at fsu
Click to expand...

Kerr ain't going anywhere. He is all Cane. Just saying his blocking skills are so far ahead of those other guys, its worth having him, and he is a future OT candidate.
 
Because that's all we currently have on our roster(blocking tes). Dobard is a beast...hope we hold on to him. LSU may come knocking.
 
HardCane said:
Because that's all we currently have on our roster(blocking tes). Dobard is a beast...hope we hold on to him. LSU may come knocking.
Click to expand...

Again, let's see who is actually still on the roster next year. And LSU already offered Dobard a long time ago. He's all Cane.
 
Advertisement
Consigliere said:
JHallCanes said:
Agreed. I don't see a TE on the roster that can't be quickly replaced.
Click to expand...

Here are my 2 pennies

1. Clive is garbage, utter garbage. He would be a good volleyball setter but is a bad receiver and his blocking isn't that good. Would cut.

2. Cleveland is okay but not that good. I wouldn't cut him yet if he can play well over the spring and improve his game.

3. Perry, no clue. Doesn't seem to good but who knows. Would cut.

4. Dye, decent blocker. Wouldn't cut him.

5. White, must be placed on IR or booted. Has done nothing but been injured.

IMO, keep Cleveland and Dye. Replace the other three, with the incoming three. Net effect is zero in terms of numbers.
Click to expand...

Cleveland doesn't even see the field so the coaches obviously believe Clive>Cleveland.
 
Warchant thinks that every commit we have that they have offered will eventually flip to them. Lol it's just comical. Gene Williams is a ******* tool. He thinks both Bryant and Collins flip to them and they also get Matt Thomas. And now Kerr. ******* homer *** Nole, hate Warchant.
 
Advertisement
Consigliere said:
JHallCanes said:
Agreed. I don't see a TE on the roster that can't be quickly replaced.
Click to expand...

Here are my 2 pennies

1. Clive is garbage, utter garbage. He would be a good volleyball setter but is a bad receiver and his blocking isn't that good. Would cut.

2. Cleveland is okay but not that good. I wouldn't cut him yet if he can play well over the spring and improve his game.

3. Perry, no clue. Doesn't seem to good but who knows. Would cut.

4. Dye, decent blocker. Wouldn't cut him.

5. White, must be placed on IR or booted. Has done nothing but been injured.

IMO, keep Cleveland and Dye. Replace the other three, with the incoming three. Net effect is zero in terms of numbers.
Click to expand...

So...Clive is garbage and you would cut him, yet our coaches have him starting over Cleveland, whom according to you is okay. That seems to make sense.

With that said, Kerr is a good TE for our offense. They seem to like to have a blocking TE and a receiving TE. If they move him to OL, then they move him. I trust Golden when it comes to analyzing talent and determining what position our players should play.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top