when UM took Dave Howell as their first verbal commitment coming of the national title of 2001, should we have all known right then and there that Coker and Co. had no clue?
I remember talking to Mike Bakas about this years ago, and he flat out told me early on this guy couldn't play and he was puzzled why they would take this guy so early in the process
But was that the harbinger we should point to?
Just amazing what was squandered in that era based on how Miami was perceived then
Yes. We should have known four things at that point. One -- no eye for talent. Two -- no strategy around recruiting (why take a commitment that early from that kid even if you thought he might turn into something, which if you did, see point one). Three, no ability to manage staff around recruiting or evaluations. And four -- perhaps worst -- an affinity for soft, gentle kids. Which begat the country club coker.
I think Howell only stuck around for a year or two( at most). thing was, his offer list wasnt all that extraordinary IIRC.
Then a year after that I remember Glen Cook and how many folks were puzzled by that one over the summer
At that point, it was clear what was plaguing UM's recruiting- uhhh, facilities.....
Howell was awful. I think he was with us more than a year or two though. Prolly 3 IIRC.
With Cook, the issue was two-fold. One was offering him so early, the other was prioritizing him over his teammate Beason, who got an offer considerably later.
Coker was clueless. Probably we should have known the first time he was interviewed. We're talking Chauncey the gardener, Forrest Gump here.