BWCD
Junior
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
- Messages
- 2,701
I remember when using a pitching machine was thought to be a major technological shift, too. Or even using a Hit-a-way/hitting stick.You're 100% wrong. It's changed drastically and we haven't budged.
http://thetandd.com/sports/usc-base...cle_a1bcace6-3b5b-5af6-ae23-14db38616a8a.html
The game itself hasn't changed, though. Some of the aids to help you get better at it have changed (as one would expect them to). However, actually playing the game with 9 guys on the field with gloves/bats/balls hasn't changed that much. Same with the strategy of the game, which really only changes with the matchups, skills, and pieces that each team has.
Jagr beat me to saying this, but whatever.
I'm not arguing against technological advances, mind you. I'm simply saying that with the things we're struggling with on the field, the right coaching with our facilities as-is would be fine to fix those things. The coaching, development, and recruiting are all suffering. Are the batting cage upgrades and the tracking technology needed? I'll not turn them down if they're implemented, but they're not the reason why we're 17-23.
Kids from Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Cuba, and the DR get drafted into the bigs every year. Some of them are signed as international FA's and demand tons of cash. Now...some of them do have access to technology, but not all. In those countries, it's hard work, reps, and a bit of luck to get your talent discovered. It's not always on a field or a place where facilities are as nice as FIU or Miami. A lot of those kids would kill to be training at Miami's facilities, and not think twice about whether or not the cages are covered or if we have ways to measure their launch angle or exiting velocity when they hit the baseball.