- Joined
- Mar 14, 2019
- Messages
- 816
Says the guy who has been arguing for three pages.
About something, though.
And something obvious.
Says the guy who has been arguing for three pages.
Lol you’re clearly a dumbass. And you don’t know how to take the L and just shut the **** up either lmao
About something, though.
And something obvious.
Why would I take the L against you?
You haven't anything remotely insightful.
You're a clown.
So you just like to argue. Own it.
Lmao what a loser.
You don't even know basic stuff about pitching and our bullpen.
You don't even know basic stuff about pitching and our bullpen.
I do though...
You clearly don't.
lmaooooooooooooo at this guy
We don't have a bullpen!
It has nothing to do with "having guys ready"
They've demonstrated that they're not reliable.
Gino has to live in reality unlike the goobers on this forum.
I do though...I had no problem keeping Cecconi in until it got to 3-1. Shoulda pulled him there. I’m not clamoring for starters to be pulled as soon as a hint of trouble arises. But a **** avalanche of trouble...as in 6 hits in an inning, warrants a pitching change.
I’ve followed the program closely for many years, and I’m pretty familiar with our roster.
So your statement is retarded. Hush now
Here's what's funny about his claim that the starter was better than the relievers......
One week ago, Cecconi gave up six earned runs in 5.1 innings against FAU. The bullpen? Five guys threw, and not one of them gave up a run.
But according to him, Cecconi was the only option since the relievers wouldn't be effective.
But the relievers aren't effective.
As has been proven.
It's a value judgment.
The bullpen is not good.
Cecconi was having maybe his best outing of the season.
The immediate response from the idiots on this forum was that it was the coach's fault that we gave up 5 runs in the inning.
It's lazy and stupid.