For those still struggling to grasp the distinction between the two, here is a case in point...
One of the recruits we'd most like to land tweets a very positive message about Miami. And here are responses from our fans on the recruit's own tweet:
"I stopped following recruiting last year, tired of getting my hopes up and getting **** on, then we have to scramble to get plan b players seen the same **** show 10 + years now, starting with that sorry as NW class in 08"
-CANESFAN121974
"I only hope I see it in the bowl game and that you playing quarterback I got news for you Manny I bought luggage for you for Christmas"
-normbeatty
I mean, WTF is the point of that?!? It's not about the criticism itself (which is warranted) it's about having some ******* common sense. As a gambling man, I'm all about probabilities. What's more likely: Those kind of responses on recruits own tweets like that are heard by people who have a hand in making changes to Miami's AD and staff and they're influenced by them, or that Washington reads the replies on his own tweet and is influenced by them? Obvious. Now, neither may happen, but one is highly likely and one is not even remotely likely.
That's the whole point. Be ****ed, yes, but be smart about it. Posting sh-t like the above everywhere possible only hurts us, it doesn't help us in any way. And no matter how disgusted your are with the AD and staff, it doesn't change that previous sentence.